Cargando…
Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses
BACKGROUND: It is not clear to what extent chewing is improved by unilateral oral rehabilitation with implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses (ISFPPs). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether patients treated with unilateral ISFPPs in the maxilla use their prostheses during masticatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13366 |
_version_ | 1784866825797894144 |
---|---|
author | Athab Abduljabbar, Zahra Svensson, Krister G. Hjalmarsson, Lars Franke Stenport, Victoria Eliasson, Alf |
author_facet | Athab Abduljabbar, Zahra Svensson, Krister G. Hjalmarsson, Lars Franke Stenport, Victoria Eliasson, Alf |
author_sort | Athab Abduljabbar, Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is not clear to what extent chewing is improved by unilateral oral rehabilitation with implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses (ISFPPs). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether patients treated with unilateral ISFPPs in the maxilla use their prostheses during mastication to the same extent as they used their contralateral natural teeth. A further aim was to investigate whether there is a correlation between preferred chewing side and laterality. METHODS: Chewing side preference was assessed in 15 participants treated with unilateral ISFPPs in the maxilla. The first, second, third, fifth and tenth chewing cycles were assessed, and the test was repeated 10 times. All participants also answered a questionnaire about their chewing side preference. RESULTS: Most of the participants presented bilateral chewing, but two (13%) chewed only on the ISFPP. There was no statistically significant association between the objectively assessed chewing side and dental status (natural teeth or ISFPPs) during any of the recorded chewing cycles (p > .1). There were statistically significant correlations between both the subjectively reported usually preferred chewing side and the subjective chewing side preference during the test and the objectively assessed chewing side for the first three chewing cycles (p < .01). No correlation was found between handedness and the objectively assessed chewing side. CONCLUSION: In the present study, most participants chewed bilaterally, and chewing was performed both on the ISFPP and on the natural teeth. No correlation was found between the preferred chewing side, objectively or subjectively determined and laterality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98263352023-01-09 Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses Athab Abduljabbar, Zahra Svensson, Krister G. Hjalmarsson, Lars Franke Stenport, Victoria Eliasson, Alf J Oral Rehabil Original Articles BACKGROUND: It is not clear to what extent chewing is improved by unilateral oral rehabilitation with implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses (ISFPPs). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether patients treated with unilateral ISFPPs in the maxilla use their prostheses during mastication to the same extent as they used their contralateral natural teeth. A further aim was to investigate whether there is a correlation between preferred chewing side and laterality. METHODS: Chewing side preference was assessed in 15 participants treated with unilateral ISFPPs in the maxilla. The first, second, third, fifth and tenth chewing cycles were assessed, and the test was repeated 10 times. All participants also answered a questionnaire about their chewing side preference. RESULTS: Most of the participants presented bilateral chewing, but two (13%) chewed only on the ISFPP. There was no statistically significant association between the objectively assessed chewing side and dental status (natural teeth or ISFPPs) during any of the recorded chewing cycles (p > .1). There were statistically significant correlations between both the subjectively reported usually preferred chewing side and the subjective chewing side preference during the test and the objectively assessed chewing side for the first three chewing cycles (p < .01). No correlation was found between handedness and the objectively assessed chewing side. CONCLUSION: In the present study, most participants chewed bilaterally, and chewing was performed both on the ISFPP and on the natural teeth. No correlation was found between the preferred chewing side, objectively or subjectively determined and laterality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-18 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9826335/ /pubmed/36065716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13366 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Athab Abduljabbar, Zahra Svensson, Krister G. Hjalmarsson, Lars Franke Stenport, Victoria Eliasson, Alf Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
title | Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
title_full | Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
title_fullStr | Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
title_full_unstemmed | Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
title_short | Chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
title_sort | chewing side preference and laterality in patients treated with unilateral posterior implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT athababduljabbarzahra chewingsidepreferenceandlateralityinpatientstreatedwithunilateralposteriorimplantsupportedfixedpartialprostheses AT svenssonkristerg chewingsidepreferenceandlateralityinpatientstreatedwithunilateralposteriorimplantsupportedfixedpartialprostheses AT hjalmarssonlars chewingsidepreferenceandlateralityinpatientstreatedwithunilateralposteriorimplantsupportedfixedpartialprostheses AT frankestenportvictoria chewingsidepreferenceandlateralityinpatientstreatedwithunilateralposteriorimplantsupportedfixedpartialprostheses AT eliassonalf chewingsidepreferenceandlateralityinpatientstreatedwithunilateralposteriorimplantsupportedfixedpartialprostheses |