Cargando…
Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication
Deletions and duplications at the chromosomal region of 16p11.2 have a broad range of phenotypic effects including increased likelihood of intellectual disability, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, and language and motor delays. However, whether and how sensory proce...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2802 |
_version_ | 1784866826038018048 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Harriet Lane, Chloe Al‐Jawahiri, Reem Freeth, Megan |
author_facet | Smith, Harriet Lane, Chloe Al‐Jawahiri, Reem Freeth, Megan |
author_sort | Smith, Harriet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deletions and duplications at the chromosomal region of 16p11.2 have a broad range of phenotypic effects including increased likelihood of intellectual disability, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, and language and motor delays. However, whether and how sensory processing is affected has not yet been considered in detail. Parents/caregivers of 38 children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 31 children with a 16p11.2 duplication completed the Sensory Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the Child Sensory Profile 2 (CSP‐2) along with other standardized questionnaires assessing autistic traits (SRS‐2), ADHD traits (Conners 3), anxiety (SCAS‐P) and adaptive behavior (VABS‐3). SBQ and CSP‐2 responses found that sensory processing differences were clearly evident in both 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication, though there was significant variation in both cohorts. SBQ data indicated the frequency and impact of sensory behavior were more severe when compared to neurotypical children, with levels being similar to autistic children. CSP‐2 data indicated over 70% of children displayed clear differences in sensory registration (missing sensory input). Seventy‐one percent with 16p11.2 duplications were also unusually sensitive to sensory information and 57% with 16p11.2 duplications were unusually avoidant of sensory stimuli. This first detailed assessment of sensory processing, alongside other clinical features, in relatively large cohorts of children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication demonstrates that sensory processing differences have a profound impact on their lives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98263362023-01-09 Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication Smith, Harriet Lane, Chloe Al‐Jawahiri, Reem Freeth, Megan Autism Res PSYCHOLOGY Deletions and duplications at the chromosomal region of 16p11.2 have a broad range of phenotypic effects including increased likelihood of intellectual disability, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, and language and motor delays. However, whether and how sensory processing is affected has not yet been considered in detail. Parents/caregivers of 38 children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 31 children with a 16p11.2 duplication completed the Sensory Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the Child Sensory Profile 2 (CSP‐2) along with other standardized questionnaires assessing autistic traits (SRS‐2), ADHD traits (Conners 3), anxiety (SCAS‐P) and adaptive behavior (VABS‐3). SBQ and CSP‐2 responses found that sensory processing differences were clearly evident in both 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication, though there was significant variation in both cohorts. SBQ data indicated the frequency and impact of sensory behavior were more severe when compared to neurotypical children, with levels being similar to autistic children. CSP‐2 data indicated over 70% of children displayed clear differences in sensory registration (missing sensory input). Seventy‐one percent with 16p11.2 duplications were also unusually sensitive to sensory information and 57% with 16p11.2 duplications were unusually avoidant of sensory stimuli. This first detailed assessment of sensory processing, alongside other clinical features, in relatively large cohorts of children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication demonstrates that sensory processing differences have a profound impact on their lives. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-09-02 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9826336/ /pubmed/36053814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2802 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | PSYCHOLOGY Smith, Harriet Lane, Chloe Al‐Jawahiri, Reem Freeth, Megan Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
title | Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
title_full | Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
title_fullStr | Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
title_short | Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
title_sort | sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication |
topic | PSYCHOLOGY |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithharriet sensoryprocessingin16p112deletionand16p112duplication AT lanechloe sensoryprocessingin16p112deletionand16p112duplication AT aljawahirireem sensoryprocessingin16p112deletionand16p112duplication AT freethmegan sensoryprocessingin16p112deletionand16p112duplication |