Cargando…
The relationship between pre‐ and postprostatectomy measures of pelvic floor muscle function and development of early incontinence after surgery
AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate (i) whether pelvic floor muscle (PFM) shortening can be enhanced by provision of training focused on striated urethral sphincter (SUS) with feedback before prostatectomy, (ii) whether PFM shortening during voluntary efforts and coughing before and after...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.25034 |
Sumario: | AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate (i) whether pelvic floor muscle (PFM) shortening can be enhanced by provision of training focused on striated urethral sphincter (SUS) with feedback before prostatectomy, (ii) whether PFM shortening during voluntary efforts and coughing before and after prostatectomy differs between men who do and do not report symptoms of urinary incontinence 1 month after prostatectomy, and (iii) the relationship between severity of incontinence after prostatectomy and features of pelvic floor function (muscle shortening) and urethral length before and after prostatectomy. METHODS: Sixty men referred for preoperative PFM training before radical prostatectomy participated. The International Continence Society Male Short Form questionnaire was used to quantify continence status. Transperineal ultrasound (US) imaging was used to record pelvic displacements related to activation of striated urethral sphincter, bulbocavernosus (BC) and puborectalis muscles during cough, “natural” voluntary contraction following pamphlet instruction, and trained voluntary contraction after formal physiotherapist instruction including US feedback. RESULTS: Pelvic floor displacements following training differed between continent and incontinent men; continent participants demonstrated increased SUS shortening after training (compared with “natural”), but no difference was observed between trained and “natural” contractions for incontinent participants. Motion at ano‐rectal junction during cough was reduced following surgery, but voluntary and involuntary activation of SUS or BC was not consistently affected by surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Participants' capacity to improve function of the SUS with training appears related to postprostatectomy continence outcome. |
---|