Cargando…

Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti‐D prophylaxis, administered to RhD‐negative women, has significantly reduced the incidence of RhD immunization. Non‐invasive fetal RHD screening has been used in Stockholm for more than 10 years to identify women who will benefit from prophylaxis. The method is based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uzunel, Mehmet, Tiblad, Eleonor, Mörtberg, Anette, Wikman, Agneta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.13348
_version_ 1784866840747442176
author Uzunel, Mehmet
Tiblad, Eleonor
Mörtberg, Anette
Wikman, Agneta
author_facet Uzunel, Mehmet
Tiblad, Eleonor
Mörtberg, Anette
Wikman, Agneta
author_sort Uzunel, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti‐D prophylaxis, administered to RhD‐negative women, has significantly reduced the incidence of RhD immunization. Non‐invasive fetal RHD screening has been used in Stockholm for more than 10 years to identify women who will benefit from prophylaxis. The method is based on a single‐exon approach and is used in early pregnancy. The aim of this study was to update the performance of the method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single exon assay from Devyser AB is a multiplex kit detecting both exon 4 of the RHD gene and the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Cell‐free DNA was extracted from 1 ml of plasma from EDTA blood taken during early pregnancy, weeks 10–12. The genetic RHD results were compared with serological typing of newborns for a determination of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: In total, 4337 pregnancies were included in the study; 44 samples (1%) were inconclusive either due to maternal RHD gene variants (n = 34) or technical reasons (n = 10). Of the remaining 4293 pregnancies, a total number of nine discrepant results were found. False positive results (n = 7) were mainly (n = 4) due to RHD gene variants in the child. False‐negative results were found in two cases, of which one was caused by a technical error. None of the false‐negative cases was due to RHD gene variants. Overall, the sensitivity of the method was 99.93% and specificity 99.56%. CONCLUSION: The single‐exon assay used in this study is correlated with high sensitivity and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9826394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98263942023-01-09 Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience Uzunel, Mehmet Tiblad, Eleonor Mörtberg, Anette Wikman, Agneta Vox Sang Original Articles BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti‐D prophylaxis, administered to RhD‐negative women, has significantly reduced the incidence of RhD immunization. Non‐invasive fetal RHD screening has been used in Stockholm for more than 10 years to identify women who will benefit from prophylaxis. The method is based on a single‐exon approach and is used in early pregnancy. The aim of this study was to update the performance of the method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single exon assay from Devyser AB is a multiplex kit detecting both exon 4 of the RHD gene and the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Cell‐free DNA was extracted from 1 ml of plasma from EDTA blood taken during early pregnancy, weeks 10–12. The genetic RHD results were compared with serological typing of newborns for a determination of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: In total, 4337 pregnancies were included in the study; 44 samples (1%) were inconclusive either due to maternal RHD gene variants (n = 34) or technical reasons (n = 10). Of the remaining 4293 pregnancies, a total number of nine discrepant results were found. False positive results (n = 7) were mainly (n = 4) due to RHD gene variants in the child. False‐negative results were found in two cases, of which one was caused by a technical error. None of the false‐negative cases was due to RHD gene variants. Overall, the sensitivity of the method was 99.93% and specificity 99.56%. CONCLUSION: The single‐exon assay used in this study is correlated with high sensitivity and specificity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-09-14 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9826394/ /pubmed/36102142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.13348 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Uzunel, Mehmet
Tiblad, Eleonor
Mörtberg, Anette
Wikman, Agneta
Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience
title Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience
title_full Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience
title_fullStr Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience
title_full_unstemmed Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience
title_short Single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience
title_sort single‐exon approach to non‐invasive fetal rhd screening in early pregnancy: an update after 10 years' experience
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.13348
work_keys_str_mv AT uzunelmehmet singleexonapproachtononinvasivefetalrhdscreeninginearlypregnancyanupdateafter10yearsexperience
AT tibladeleonor singleexonapproachtononinvasivefetalrhdscreeninginearlypregnancyanupdateafter10yearsexperience
AT mortberganette singleexonapproachtononinvasivefetalrhdscreeninginearlypregnancyanupdateafter10yearsexperience
AT wikmanagneta singleexonapproachtononinvasivefetalrhdscreeninginearlypregnancyanupdateafter10yearsexperience