Cargando…
International consensus recommendations for management of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) including febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): Summary and clinical tools
OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus‐based recommendations for the management of adult and pediatric patients with new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE)/febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) based on best available evidence and expert opinion. METHODS: The Delphi methodology was f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35951466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.17391 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus‐based recommendations for the management of adult and pediatric patients with new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE)/febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) based on best available evidence and expert opinion. METHODS: The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of nine experts was established who defined the scope, users, and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment, and research directions were generated that were then voted on using a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater than or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3. RESULTS: Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: (1) disease characteristics; (2) diagnostic testing and sampling; (3) acute treatment; (4) treatment in the post‐acute phase; and (5) research, registries, and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. These are summarized in this article along with two practical clinical flowsheets: one for diagnosis and evaluation and one for acute treatment. A corresponding evidence‐based analysis of all 85 recommendations alongside responses by the Delphi panel is presented in a companion article. SIGNIFICANCE: The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis; evaluation; and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES; and for planning of future research. |
---|