Cargando…

Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial

The Difficult Airway Society recommends that all patients should be pre‐oxygenated before the induction of general anaesthesia, but this may not always be easy or comfortable and anaesthesia may often be induced without full pre‐oxygenation. We tested the hypothesis that high‐flow nasal oxygen cannu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merry, A. F., van Waart, H., Allen, S. J., Baker, P. A., Cumin, D., Frampton, C. M. A., Gargiulo, D. A., Hannam, J. A., Keogh, G. F., Moore, M. R., Payton, M., Mitchell, S. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15853
_version_ 1784866866850693120
author Merry, A. F.
van Waart, H.
Allen, S. J.
Baker, P. A.
Cumin, D.
Frampton, C. M. A.
Gargiulo, D. A.
Hannam, J. A.
Keogh, G. F.
Moore, M. R.
Payton, M.
Mitchell, S. J.
author_facet Merry, A. F.
van Waart, H.
Allen, S. J.
Baker, P. A.
Cumin, D.
Frampton, C. M. A.
Gargiulo, D. A.
Hannam, J. A.
Keogh, G. F.
Moore, M. R.
Payton, M.
Mitchell, S. J.
author_sort Merry, A. F.
collection PubMed
description The Difficult Airway Society recommends that all patients should be pre‐oxygenated before the induction of general anaesthesia, but this may not always be easy or comfortable and anaesthesia may often be induced without full pre‐oxygenation. We tested the hypothesis that high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae would be easier and more comfortable than facemasks for pre‐oxygenation. We randomly allocated 199 patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥ 10 years to pre‐oxygenation using either high‐flow nasal oxygen or facemask. Ease and comfort were assessed by anaesthetists and patients on 10‐cm visual analogue scale and six‐point smiley face scale, respectively. Secondary endpoints included end‐tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway and time to secure an airway. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in ratings of ‐0.76 (‐1.25 to ‐0.27) cm for ease of use (p = 0.003) and ‐0.45 (‐0.75 to ‐0.13) points for comfort (p = 0.006), both favoured high‐flow nasal oxygen. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in end‐tidal oxygen fraction of 3.89% (2.41–5.37%) after securing a definitive airway also favoured high‐flow nasal oxygen (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients with hypoxaemia (S(p)O(2) < 90%) or severe hypoxaemia (S(p)O(2) < 85%) lasting ≥ 1 min or ≥ 2 min; in the proportion of patients with an end‐tidal oxygen fraction < 87% in the first 5 min after tracheal intubation (52.2% vs. 58.9% in facemask and high‐flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.31); or in time taken to secure an airway (11.6 vs. 12.2 min in facemask and high‐flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.65). In conclusion, we found pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen to be easier for anaesthetists and more comfortable for patients than pre‐oxygenation with a facemask, with no clinically relevant differences in end‐tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway or time to secure an airway. The differences in ease and comfort were modest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9826500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98265002023-01-09 Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial Merry, A. F. van Waart, H. Allen, S. J. Baker, P. A. Cumin, D. Frampton, C. M. A. Gargiulo, D. A. Hannam, J. A. Keogh, G. F. Moore, M. R. Payton, M. Mitchell, S. J. Anaesthesia Original Articles The Difficult Airway Society recommends that all patients should be pre‐oxygenated before the induction of general anaesthesia, but this may not always be easy or comfortable and anaesthesia may often be induced without full pre‐oxygenation. We tested the hypothesis that high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae would be easier and more comfortable than facemasks for pre‐oxygenation. We randomly allocated 199 patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥ 10 years to pre‐oxygenation using either high‐flow nasal oxygen or facemask. Ease and comfort were assessed by anaesthetists and patients on 10‐cm visual analogue scale and six‐point smiley face scale, respectively. Secondary endpoints included end‐tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway and time to secure an airway. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in ratings of ‐0.76 (‐1.25 to ‐0.27) cm for ease of use (p = 0.003) and ‐0.45 (‐0.75 to ‐0.13) points for comfort (p = 0.006), both favoured high‐flow nasal oxygen. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in end‐tidal oxygen fraction of 3.89% (2.41–5.37%) after securing a definitive airway also favoured high‐flow nasal oxygen (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients with hypoxaemia (S(p)O(2) < 90%) or severe hypoxaemia (S(p)O(2) < 85%) lasting ≥ 1 min or ≥ 2 min; in the proportion of patients with an end‐tidal oxygen fraction < 87% in the first 5 min after tracheal intubation (52.2% vs. 58.9% in facemask and high‐flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.31); or in time taken to secure an airway (11.6 vs. 12.2 min in facemask and high‐flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.65). In conclusion, we found pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen to be easier for anaesthetists and more comfortable for patients than pre‐oxygenation with a facemask, with no clinically relevant differences in end‐tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway or time to secure an airway. The differences in ease and comfort were modest. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-15 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9826500/ /pubmed/36110039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15853 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Merry, A. F.
van Waart, H.
Allen, S. J.
Baker, P. A.
Cumin, D.
Frampton, C. M. A.
Gargiulo, D. A.
Hannam, J. A.
Keogh, G. F.
Moore, M. R.
Payton, M.
Mitchell, S. J.
Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
title Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort ease and comfort of pre‐oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen cannulae vs. facemask: a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15853
work_keys_str_mv AT merryaf easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwaarth easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT allensj easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bakerpa easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cumind easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT framptoncma easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gargiuloda easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hannamja easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keoghgf easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mooremr easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT paytonm easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitchellsj easeandcomfortofpreoxygenationwithhighflownasaloxygencannulaevsfacemaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial