Cargando…
Understanding the Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Airway Resistance in Patients with Severe COPD: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on airway resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with severe airway obstruction and hyperinflation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with data from severe COPD cases w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36628301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S384127 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on airway resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with severe airway obstruction and hyperinflation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with data from severe COPD cases with those who underwent an 8-week PR program. Main inclusion criteria were having severe airflow obstruction (defined as a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) <50%) and plethysmographic evaluation findings being compatible with hyperinflation supporting the diagnosis of emphysema (presence of hyperinflation defined as functional residual capacity ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) >120%). Primary outcomes were airway resistance (R(aw)) and airway conductance (G(aw)) which were measured by body plethysmography, and other measurements were performed, including 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and COPD assessment test (CAT). RESULTS: Twenty-six severe and very severe COPD patients (FEV(1,) 35.0 ± 13.1%; RV/TLC, 163.5 ± 29.4) were included in the analyses, mean age 62.6 ± 5.8 years and 88.5% males. Following rehabilitation, significant improvements in total specific airway resistance percentage (sR(awtot)%, p = 0.040) and total specific airway conductance percentage (sG(awtot)%; p = 0.010) were observed. The post-rehabilitation mMRC scores and CAT values were significantly decreased compared to baseline results (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Although there were significant improvements in 6-MWT value (p < 0.001), exercise desaturation (ΔSaO(2), p = 0.026), the changes in measured lung capacity and volume values were not significant. CONCLUSION: We concluded that PR may have a positive effect on airway resistance and airway conductance in COPD patients with severe airflow obstruction. |
---|