Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soni, Abhishek, Jadhav, Ganesh K, Manocha, Sapna, Chauhan, Sunil, Goswami, Brijesh, Verma, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632300
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116
_version_ 1784866904952799232
author Soni, Abhishek
Jadhav, Ganesh K
Manocha, Sapna
Chauhan, Sunil
Goswami, Brijesh
Verma, Monica
author_facet Soni, Abhishek
Jadhav, Ganesh K
Manocha, Sapna
Chauhan, Sunil
Goswami, Brijesh
Verma, Monica
author_sort Soni, Abhishek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2018, 168 patients were randomized to hypofractionated radiation treatment and conventional fractionated radiation treatment schedules of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. All the patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy started after ADT. RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 51 (31–63) and 53 (33–64) months in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated regimes, respectively. The 3-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates were 86.9% and 73.8% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated groups, respectively (p = 0.032, significant). The 3-year bNED rates in patients at a high risk [i.e., pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 8, or T ≥ 2 c], were 87.9% and 73.5% (p = 0.007, significant) in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for late toxicity between the two groups, with 3-year grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity rates of 19% and 16.7% and 3-year grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates of 15.5% and 11.9% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated schedule is superior to the conventional fractionation schedule of radiation treatment in terms of bNED in intermediate and high grade prostate cancer patients. Also, the late toxicity is found to be equivalent between the two treatment groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9826658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98266582023-01-10 Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer Soni, Abhishek Jadhav, Ganesh K Manocha, Sapna Chauhan, Sunil Goswami, Brijesh Verma, Monica Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2018, 168 patients were randomized to hypofractionated radiation treatment and conventional fractionated radiation treatment schedules of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. All the patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy started after ADT. RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 51 (31–63) and 53 (33–64) months in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated regimes, respectively. The 3-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates were 86.9% and 73.8% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated groups, respectively (p = 0.032, significant). The 3-year bNED rates in patients at a high risk [i.e., pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 8, or T ≥ 2 c], were 87.9% and 73.5% (p = 0.007, significant) in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for late toxicity between the two groups, with 3-year grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity rates of 19% and 16.7% and 3-year grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates of 15.5% and 11.9% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated schedule is superior to the conventional fractionation schedule of radiation treatment in terms of bNED in intermediate and high grade prostate cancer patients. Also, the late toxicity is found to be equivalent between the two treatment groups. Via Medica 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9826658/ /pubmed/36632300 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116 Text en © 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Soni, Abhishek
Jadhav, Ganesh K
Manocha, Sapna
Chauhan, Sunil
Goswami, Brijesh
Verma, Monica
Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_full Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_short Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_sort comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632300
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116
work_keys_str_mv AT soniabhishek comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT jadhavganeshk comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT manochasapna comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT chauhansunil comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT goswamibrijesh comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT vermamonica comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer