Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease. MAT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632300 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116 |
_version_ | 1784866904952799232 |
---|---|
author | Soni, Abhishek Jadhav, Ganesh K Manocha, Sapna Chauhan, Sunil Goswami, Brijesh Verma, Monica |
author_facet | Soni, Abhishek Jadhav, Ganesh K Manocha, Sapna Chauhan, Sunil Goswami, Brijesh Verma, Monica |
author_sort | Soni, Abhishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2018, 168 patients were randomized to hypofractionated radiation treatment and conventional fractionated radiation treatment schedules of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. All the patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy started after ADT. RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 51 (31–63) and 53 (33–64) months in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated regimes, respectively. The 3-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates were 86.9% and 73.8% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated groups, respectively (p = 0.032, significant). The 3-year bNED rates in patients at a high risk [i.e., pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 8, or T ≥ 2 c], were 87.9% and 73.5% (p = 0.007, significant) in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for late toxicity between the two groups, with 3-year grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity rates of 19% and 16.7% and 3-year grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates of 15.5% and 11.9% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated schedule is superior to the conventional fractionation schedule of radiation treatment in terms of bNED in intermediate and high grade prostate cancer patients. Also, the late toxicity is found to be equivalent between the two treatment groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Via Medica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98266582023-01-10 Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer Soni, Abhishek Jadhav, Ganesh K Manocha, Sapna Chauhan, Sunil Goswami, Brijesh Verma, Monica Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2018, 168 patients were randomized to hypofractionated radiation treatment and conventional fractionated radiation treatment schedules of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. All the patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy started after ADT. RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 51 (31–63) and 53 (33–64) months in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated regimes, respectively. The 3-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates were 86.9% and 73.8% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated groups, respectively (p = 0.032, significant). The 3-year bNED rates in patients at a high risk [i.e., pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 8, or T ≥ 2 c], were 87.9% and 73.5% (p = 0.007, significant) in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for late toxicity between the two groups, with 3-year grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity rates of 19% and 16.7% and 3-year grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates of 15.5% and 11.9% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated schedule is superior to the conventional fractionation schedule of radiation treatment in terms of bNED in intermediate and high grade prostate cancer patients. Also, the late toxicity is found to be equivalent between the two treatment groups. Via Medica 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9826658/ /pubmed/36632300 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116 Text en © 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Soni, Abhishek Jadhav, Ganesh K Manocha, Sapna Chauhan, Sunil Goswami, Brijesh Verma, Monica Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title | Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632300 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soniabhishek comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT jadhavganeshk comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT manochasapna comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT chauhansunil comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT goswamibrijesh comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT vermamonica comparativeevaluationofhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionallyfractionatedradiotherapyforpatientswithintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer |