Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients

Introduction The rapidly mutating Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant has replaced the previous dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants like alpha, and delta resulting in the amplification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. The present study was conducted to compare the clinical profile and vaccination statu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohanty, Monalisa, Mishra, Baijayantimala, Singh, Arvind K, Mohapatra, Prasanta R, Gupta, Kavita, Patro, Binod K, Sahu, Dinesh P, Kar, Punyatoya, Purushotham, Prashanth, Saha, Swarnatrisha, Das, Sivasankar, Mamidi, Prabhudutta, Panda, Sailendra, Mandal, Madhab Charan, Bhuniya, Sourin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36628021
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32354
_version_ 1784866914249474048
author Mohanty, Monalisa
Mishra, Baijayantimala
Singh, Arvind K
Mohapatra, Prasanta R
Gupta, Kavita
Patro, Binod K
Sahu, Dinesh P
Kar, Punyatoya
Purushotham, Prashanth
Saha, Swarnatrisha
Das, Sivasankar
Mamidi, Prabhudutta
Panda, Sailendra
Mandal, Madhab Charan
Bhuniya, Sourin
author_facet Mohanty, Monalisa
Mishra, Baijayantimala
Singh, Arvind K
Mohapatra, Prasanta R
Gupta, Kavita
Patro, Binod K
Sahu, Dinesh P
Kar, Punyatoya
Purushotham, Prashanth
Saha, Swarnatrisha
Das, Sivasankar
Mamidi, Prabhudutta
Panda, Sailendra
Mandal, Madhab Charan
Bhuniya, Sourin
author_sort Mohanty, Monalisa
collection PubMed
description Introduction The rapidly mutating Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant has replaced the previous dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants like alpha, and delta resulting in the amplification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. The present study was conducted to compare the clinical profile and vaccination status in patients infected with Omicron and non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants. Methods All patients who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the study period (January 2022 to February 2022) were further tested for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by using Omisure kit (TATA MD CHECK RT-PCR, TATA MEDICAL AND DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED, Tamil Nadu, INDIA). Clinico-demographic factors and vaccination status were compared between both Omicron and non-Omicron groups. Results A total of 1,722 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were included in the study, of which 656 (38.1%) were Omicron and 1,066 (61.9%) were non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants. Blood group and vaccination status were the major predictors for Omicron. The proportion of male patients was 58.4% in the Omicron group and 57.9% in the non-Omicron group. Maximum cases (86.2%) belonged to >18-60 years age group, 7.3% to >60 years age group, and least to 0-18 years (6.5%). The average age of the study participants was 35.4 ± 14.5 years. Vaccinated participants had less chance of having Omicron than the unvaccinated participants (p-value - 0.003). Fever and loss of smell were found to be significantly associated with the non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant. (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion The present study reflects that the clinical course of the disease is milder in Omicron as compared to the non-Omicron variant. However rapid rise in cases can badly affect the healthcare system demanding good preparedness to tackle all the predicaments. Good Vaccination coverage should be of utmost priority irrespective of the variant type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9826697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98266972023-01-09 Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients Mohanty, Monalisa Mishra, Baijayantimala Singh, Arvind K Mohapatra, Prasanta R Gupta, Kavita Patro, Binod K Sahu, Dinesh P Kar, Punyatoya Purushotham, Prashanth Saha, Swarnatrisha Das, Sivasankar Mamidi, Prabhudutta Panda, Sailendra Mandal, Madhab Charan Bhuniya, Sourin Cureus Preventive Medicine Introduction The rapidly mutating Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant has replaced the previous dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants like alpha, and delta resulting in the amplification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. The present study was conducted to compare the clinical profile and vaccination status in patients infected with Omicron and non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants. Methods All patients who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the study period (January 2022 to February 2022) were further tested for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by using Omisure kit (TATA MD CHECK RT-PCR, TATA MEDICAL AND DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED, Tamil Nadu, INDIA). Clinico-demographic factors and vaccination status were compared between both Omicron and non-Omicron groups. Results A total of 1,722 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were included in the study, of which 656 (38.1%) were Omicron and 1,066 (61.9%) were non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants. Blood group and vaccination status were the major predictors for Omicron. The proportion of male patients was 58.4% in the Omicron group and 57.9% in the non-Omicron group. Maximum cases (86.2%) belonged to >18-60 years age group, 7.3% to >60 years age group, and least to 0-18 years (6.5%). The average age of the study participants was 35.4 ± 14.5 years. Vaccinated participants had less chance of having Omicron than the unvaccinated participants (p-value - 0.003). Fever and loss of smell were found to be significantly associated with the non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant. (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion The present study reflects that the clinical course of the disease is milder in Omicron as compared to the non-Omicron variant. However rapid rise in cases can badly affect the healthcare system demanding good preparedness to tackle all the predicaments. Good Vaccination coverage should be of utmost priority irrespective of the variant type. Cureus 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9826697/ /pubmed/36628021 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32354 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mohanty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Preventive Medicine
Mohanty, Monalisa
Mishra, Baijayantimala
Singh, Arvind K
Mohapatra, Prasanta R
Gupta, Kavita
Patro, Binod K
Sahu, Dinesh P
Kar, Punyatoya
Purushotham, Prashanth
Saha, Swarnatrisha
Das, Sivasankar
Mamidi, Prabhudutta
Panda, Sailendra
Mandal, Madhab Charan
Bhuniya, Sourin
Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients
title Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients
title_full Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients
title_short Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Omicron and Non-omicron SARS Coronavirus-2 Patients
title_sort comparison of clinical presentation and vaccine effectiveness among omicron and non-omicron sars coronavirus-2 patients
topic Preventive Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36628021
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32354
work_keys_str_mv AT mohantymonalisa comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT mishrabaijayantimala comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT singharvindk comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT mohapatraprasantar comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT guptakavita comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT patrobinodk comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT sahudineshp comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT karpunyatoya comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT purushothamprashanth comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT sahaswarnatrisha comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT dassivasankar comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT mamidiprabhudutta comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT pandasailendra comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT mandalmadhabcharan comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients
AT bhuniyasourin comparisonofclinicalpresentationandvaccineeffectivenessamongomicronandnonomicronsarscoronavirus2patients