Cargando…
Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience
BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a type of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion technique used for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic efficacy of OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation alone and OLIF re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.989372 |
_version_ | 1784866933546418176 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Meng-Ting Chung, Tzu-Tsao Chen, Shao-Ching Kao, Tzu-Jen Song, Wen-Shin |
author_facet | Wu, Meng-Ting Chung, Tzu-Tsao Chen, Shao-Ching Kao, Tzu-Jen Song, Wen-Shin |
author_sort | Wu, Meng-Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a type of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion technique used for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic efficacy of OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation alone and OLIF requiring fixation with conventional posterior percutaneous pedicle screws for lumbar diseases. METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients admitted to Cheng-Hsin Hospital who received OLIF between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups by screw fixation: patients who received anterolateral screw fixation alone were defined as one-stage OLIF (n = 9) and patients who received fixation with conventional posterior percutaneous pedicle screw were defined as two-stage OLIF (n = 16). Patient clinical characteristics, medical history, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, peri-operative, and post-operative complications were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 25 patients were successfully treated with OLIF (n = 9 one-stage; n = 16 two-stage). Two-stage OLIF was associated with longer operation times, longer hospital stays, shorter bed-rest time, and a greater likelihood of having a blood transfusion compared with the one-stage OLIF group. A higher proportion of grade I subsidence was observed at 6 months and 1 year after surgery in the two-stage group compared with the one-stage group. Post-operative complications included ileus, dystonia, and dystonia were higher in the two-stage OLIF group. Improvements in radiographic parameters were demonstrated after OLIF, and the improvements were comparable between one-stage and two-stage OLIF. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage OLIF is a feasible and efficacious treatment method for single- and multiple-level degenerative lumbar diseases. Additional clinical follow-up is necessary to confirm long-term outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98267952023-01-10 Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience Wu, Meng-Ting Chung, Tzu-Tsao Chen, Shao-Ching Kao, Tzu-Jen Song, Wen-Shin Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a type of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion technique used for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic efficacy of OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation alone and OLIF requiring fixation with conventional posterior percutaneous pedicle screws for lumbar diseases. METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients admitted to Cheng-Hsin Hospital who received OLIF between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups by screw fixation: patients who received anterolateral screw fixation alone were defined as one-stage OLIF (n = 9) and patients who received fixation with conventional posterior percutaneous pedicle screw were defined as two-stage OLIF (n = 16). Patient clinical characteristics, medical history, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, peri-operative, and post-operative complications were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 25 patients were successfully treated with OLIF (n = 9 one-stage; n = 16 two-stage). Two-stage OLIF was associated with longer operation times, longer hospital stays, shorter bed-rest time, and a greater likelihood of having a blood transfusion compared with the one-stage OLIF group. A higher proportion of grade I subsidence was observed at 6 months and 1 year after surgery in the two-stage group compared with the one-stage group. Post-operative complications included ileus, dystonia, and dystonia were higher in the two-stage OLIF group. Improvements in radiographic parameters were demonstrated after OLIF, and the improvements were comparable between one-stage and two-stage OLIF. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage OLIF is a feasible and efficacious treatment method for single- and multiple-level degenerative lumbar diseases. Additional clinical follow-up is necessary to confirm long-term outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9826795/ /pubmed/36632522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.989372 Text en © 2022 Wu, Chung, Chung, Kao and Song. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Wu, Meng-Ting Chung, Tzu-Tsao Chen, Shao-Ching Kao, Tzu-Jen Song, Wen-Shin Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience |
title | Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience |
title_full | Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience |
title_fullStr | Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience |
title_short | Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – A single center experience |
title_sort | oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation – a single center experience |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.989372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wumengting obliquelateralinterbodyfusioninheterogenouslumbardiseasesanterolateralscrewfixationvsposteriorpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationasinglecenterexperience AT chungtzutsao obliquelateralinterbodyfusioninheterogenouslumbardiseasesanterolateralscrewfixationvsposteriorpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationasinglecenterexperience AT chenshaoching obliquelateralinterbodyfusioninheterogenouslumbardiseasesanterolateralscrewfixationvsposteriorpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationasinglecenterexperience AT kaotzujen obliquelateralinterbodyfusioninheterogenouslumbardiseasesanterolateralscrewfixationvsposteriorpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationasinglecenterexperience AT songwenshin obliquelateralinterbodyfusioninheterogenouslumbardiseasesanterolateralscrewfixationvsposteriorpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationasinglecenterexperience |