Cargando…
Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate Australian primary healthcare professionals’ experiences of the rapid upscaling of telehealth during COVID-19. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Two hundred and seventeen general practitioners, nurses and allied health professional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065478 |
_version_ | 1784866965190344704 |
---|---|
author | Halcomb, Elizabeth J Ashley, Christine Dennis, Sarah McInnes, Susan Morgan, Mark Zwar, Nicholas Williams, Anna |
author_facet | Halcomb, Elizabeth J Ashley, Christine Dennis, Sarah McInnes, Susan Morgan, Mark Zwar, Nicholas Williams, Anna |
author_sort | Halcomb, Elizabeth J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate Australian primary healthcare professionals’ experiences of the rapid upscaling of telehealth during COVID-19. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Two hundred and seventeen general practitioners, nurses and allied health professionals employed in primary healthcare settings across Australia were recruited via social media and professional organisations. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated between December 2020 and March 2021. The survey comprised items about individual demographics, experiences of delivering telehealth consultations, perceived quality of telehealth consultations and future perceptions of telehealth. RESULTS: Telephone was the most widely used method of providing telehealth, with less than 50% of participants using a combination of telephone and video. Key barriers to telehealth use related to the inability to undertake physical examination or physical intervention. Telehealth was perceived to improve access to healthcare for some vulnerable groups and those living in rural settings, but reduced access for people from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Quality of telehealth care was considered mostly or somewhat the same as care provided face-to-face, with actual or perceived negative outcomes related to missed or delayed diagnosis. Overwhelmingly, participants wanted telehealth to continue with guaranteed ongoing funding. Some 43.7% of participants identified the need to further improve telehealth models of care. CONCLUSION: The rapid shift to telehealth has facilitated ongoing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, further work is required to better understand how telehealth can be best harnessed to add value to service delivery in usual care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98269262023-01-09 Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey Halcomb, Elizabeth J Ashley, Christine Dennis, Sarah McInnes, Susan Morgan, Mark Zwar, Nicholas Williams, Anna BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate Australian primary healthcare professionals’ experiences of the rapid upscaling of telehealth during COVID-19. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Two hundred and seventeen general practitioners, nurses and allied health professionals employed in primary healthcare settings across Australia were recruited via social media and professional organisations. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated between December 2020 and March 2021. The survey comprised items about individual demographics, experiences of delivering telehealth consultations, perceived quality of telehealth consultations and future perceptions of telehealth. RESULTS: Telephone was the most widely used method of providing telehealth, with less than 50% of participants using a combination of telephone and video. Key barriers to telehealth use related to the inability to undertake physical examination or physical intervention. Telehealth was perceived to improve access to healthcare for some vulnerable groups and those living in rural settings, but reduced access for people from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Quality of telehealth care was considered mostly or somewhat the same as care provided face-to-face, with actual or perceived negative outcomes related to missed or delayed diagnosis. Overwhelmingly, participants wanted telehealth to continue with guaranteed ongoing funding. Some 43.7% of participants identified the need to further improve telehealth models of care. CONCLUSION: The rapid shift to telehealth has facilitated ongoing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, further work is required to better understand how telehealth can be best harnessed to add value to service delivery in usual care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9826926/ /pubmed/36604135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065478 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Halcomb, Elizabeth J Ashley, Christine Dennis, Sarah McInnes, Susan Morgan, Mark Zwar, Nicholas Williams, Anna Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
title | Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
title_full | Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
title_fullStr | Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
title_short | Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
title_sort | telehealth use in australian primary healthcare during covid-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065478 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halcombelizabethj telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey AT ashleychristine telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey AT dennissarah telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey AT mcinnessusan telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey AT morganmark telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey AT zwarnicholas telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey AT williamsanna telehealthuseinaustralianprimaryhealthcareduringcovid19acrosssectionaldescriptivesurvey |