Cargando…
Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
In a broad sense, Rickettsiae are a group of microorganisms that can be transmitted mechanically or biologically to animals and humans. Rickettsioses are associated with hematic manifestations. Its prevalence in humans, dogs and other animals has been widely explored, but not in equine species. To d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2022.101068 |
_version_ | 1784866997833564160 |
---|---|
author | Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine Castaño-Betancourt, Karen Johana Ortega-Martínez, Juan Manuel Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R. Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A. Benites-Zapata, Vicente A. Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J. |
author_facet | Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine Castaño-Betancourt, Karen Johana Ortega-Martínez, Juan Manuel Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R. Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A. Benites-Zapata, Vicente A. Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J. |
author_sort | Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a broad sense, Rickettsiae are a group of microorganisms that can be transmitted mechanically or biologically to animals and humans. Rickettsioses are associated with hematic manifestations. Its prevalence in humans, dogs and other animals has been widely explored, but not in equine species. To determine the prevalence of Rickettsia infection in horses. A systematic review of the literature was carried out in five databases for the proportion of horses infected with Rickettsia, defined by molecular and immunological techniques. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Cochran's Q test and the I(2) statistic were used to assess the between-study-heterogeneity. The pooled prevalence of Rickettsia in equines was 37.0% (95% CI: 26.0%-47.0%), with significant heterogeneity among studies (I(2) = 98.12%). In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence of Rickettsia in horses was found to be 24.0% (95%CI: 10.0%-41.0%) for IFI, 47.0% (95%CI: 30.0%-64.0%) for IFA, 14.0% (95%CI: 11.0%-17.0%) for IFAT and 39.0% (95%CI: 0.0%-95.0%) for PCR. There was a high prevalence of Rickettsia among horses, with some of the species being zoonotic, with their corresponding implications for humans, which increasingly are in close contact with equines, particularly horses and their ticks, posing a risk for spillover and transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9827057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98270572023-01-10 Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine Castaño-Betancourt, Karen Johana Ortega-Martínez, Juan Manuel Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R. Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A. Benites-Zapata, Vicente A. Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J. New Microbes New Infect Systematic Review In a broad sense, Rickettsiae are a group of microorganisms that can be transmitted mechanically or biologically to animals and humans. Rickettsioses are associated with hematic manifestations. Its prevalence in humans, dogs and other animals has been widely explored, but not in equine species. To determine the prevalence of Rickettsia infection in horses. A systematic review of the literature was carried out in five databases for the proportion of horses infected with Rickettsia, defined by molecular and immunological techniques. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Cochran's Q test and the I(2) statistic were used to assess the between-study-heterogeneity. The pooled prevalence of Rickettsia in equines was 37.0% (95% CI: 26.0%-47.0%), with significant heterogeneity among studies (I(2) = 98.12%). In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence of Rickettsia in horses was found to be 24.0% (95%CI: 10.0%-41.0%) for IFI, 47.0% (95%CI: 30.0%-64.0%) for IFA, 14.0% (95%CI: 11.0%-17.0%) for IFAT and 39.0% (95%CI: 0.0%-95.0%) for PCR. There was a high prevalence of Rickettsia among horses, with some of the species being zoonotic, with their corresponding implications for humans, which increasingly are in close contact with equines, particularly horses and their ticks, posing a risk for spillover and transmission. Elsevier 2022-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9827057/ /pubmed/36632173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2022.101068 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine Castaño-Betancourt, Karen Johana Ortega-Martínez, Juan Manuel Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R. Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A. Benites-Zapata, Vicente A. Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J. Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic Rickettsia in horses: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of zoonotic and non-zoonotic rickettsia in horses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2022.101068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonillaaldanadkatterine prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT castanobetancourtkarenjohana prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ortegamartinezjuanmanuel prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ulloquebadaraccojuanr prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hernandezbustamanteenriquea prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT beniteszapatavicentea prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodriguezmoralesalfonsoj prevalenceofzoonoticandnonzoonoticrickettsiainhorsesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |