Cargando…
Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of using automated appointment check-in screens to collect brief research data from patients, prior to their general practice consultation. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Nine general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Recruitment co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062389 |
_version_ | 1784867035810889728 |
---|---|
author | Lawton, Sarah Mallen, Christian Muller, Sara Wathall, Simon Helliwell, Toby |
author_facet | Lawton, Sarah Mallen, Christian Muller, Sara Wathall, Simon Helliwell, Toby |
author_sort | Lawton, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of using automated appointment check-in screens to collect brief research data from patients, prior to their general practice consultation. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Nine general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Recruitment commenced in Autumn 2018 and was concluded by 31 March 2019. PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 18 years and above, self-completing an automated check-in screen prior to their general practice consultation, were invited to participate during a 3-week recruitment period. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The response rate to the use of the automated check-in screen as a research data collection tool was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included responses to the two research questions and an assessment of impact of check-in completion on general practice operationalisation RESULTS: Over 85% (n=9274) of patients self-completing an automated check-in screen participated in the Automated Check-in Data Collection Study (61.0% (n=5653) women, mean age 55.1 years (range 18–98 years, SD=18.5)). 96.2% (n=8922) of participants answered a ‘clinical’ research question, reporting the degree of bodily pain experienced during the past 4 weeks: 32.9% (n=2937) experienced no pain, 28.1% (n=2507) very mild or mild pain and 39.0% (n=3478) moderate, severe or very severe pain. 89.3% (n=8285) of participants answered a ‘non-clinical’ research question on contact regarding future research studies: 46.9% (n=3889) of participants responded ‘Yes, I’d be happy for you to contact me about research of relevance to me’. CONCLUSIONS: Using automated check-in facilities to integrate research into routine general practice is a potentially useful way to collect brief research data from patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic initiating an extensive digital transformation in society, now is an ideal time to build on these opportunities and investigate alternative, innovative ways to collect research data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82531292. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9827265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98272652023-01-10 Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England Lawton, Sarah Mallen, Christian Muller, Sara Wathall, Simon Helliwell, Toby BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of using automated appointment check-in screens to collect brief research data from patients, prior to their general practice consultation. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Nine general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Recruitment commenced in Autumn 2018 and was concluded by 31 March 2019. PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 18 years and above, self-completing an automated check-in screen prior to their general practice consultation, were invited to participate during a 3-week recruitment period. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The response rate to the use of the automated check-in screen as a research data collection tool was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included responses to the two research questions and an assessment of impact of check-in completion on general practice operationalisation RESULTS: Over 85% (n=9274) of patients self-completing an automated check-in screen participated in the Automated Check-in Data Collection Study (61.0% (n=5653) women, mean age 55.1 years (range 18–98 years, SD=18.5)). 96.2% (n=8922) of participants answered a ‘clinical’ research question, reporting the degree of bodily pain experienced during the past 4 weeks: 32.9% (n=2937) experienced no pain, 28.1% (n=2507) very mild or mild pain and 39.0% (n=3478) moderate, severe or very severe pain. 89.3% (n=8285) of participants answered a ‘non-clinical’ research question on contact regarding future research studies: 46.9% (n=3889) of participants responded ‘Yes, I’d be happy for you to contact me about research of relevance to me’. CONCLUSIONS: Using automated check-in facilities to integrate research into routine general practice is a potentially useful way to collect brief research data from patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic initiating an extensive digital transformation in society, now is an ideal time to build on these opportunities and investigate alternative, innovative ways to collect research data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82531292. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9827265/ /pubmed/36604124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062389 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Lawton, Sarah Mallen, Christian Muller, Sara Wathall, Simon Helliwell, Toby Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
title | Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
title_full | Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
title_fullStr | Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
title_short | Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
title_sort | investigating the usefulness of automated check-in data collection in general practice (ac dc study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in england |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawtonsarah investigatingtheusefulnessofautomatedcheckindatacollectioningeneralpracticeacdcstudyamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinengland AT mallenchristian investigatingtheusefulnessofautomatedcheckindatacollectioningeneralpracticeacdcstudyamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinengland AT mullersara investigatingtheusefulnessofautomatedcheckindatacollectioningeneralpracticeacdcstudyamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinengland AT wathallsimon investigatingtheusefulnessofautomatedcheckindatacollectioningeneralpracticeacdcstudyamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinengland AT helliwelltoby investigatingtheusefulnessofautomatedcheckindatacollectioningeneralpracticeacdcstudyamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinengland |