Cargando…
Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary obstructive megaureter (POM) has various courses in different age populations. Although open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) remains the standard treatment for symptomatic POM, it is highly invasive with potential complications. In recent years, minimally invasive ure...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632159 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-448 |
_version_ | 1784867052632145920 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhenyu Yang, Kunlin Li, Xinfei Chen, Silu Wang, Xiang Li, Zhihua Li, Xuesong |
author_facet | Li, Zhenyu Yang, Kunlin Li, Xinfei Chen, Silu Wang, Xiang Li, Zhihua Li, Xuesong |
author_sort | Li, Zhenyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary obstructive megaureter (POM) has various courses in different age populations. Although open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) remains the standard treatment for symptomatic POM, it is highly invasive with potential complications. In recent years, minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation (MIUR), including laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (LUR) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR), and endoscopic management, such as double-J stent insertion, endoureterotomy and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD), have been utilized for POM in selected patients. However, few comparable studies between MIUR and endoscopic management have been published to date, and it remains unclear which surgical management is the optimal choice for POM in different age groups. This review provides a comprehensive perspective on technical development and clinical outcomes of MIUR and endoscopic management for POM in pediatric and adult populations. METHODS: The PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to comprehensively search English language articles related to MIUR and endoscopic management for POM in pediatric and adult populations up to March 2022. The technical modifications and the relevant clinical outcomes were reviewed. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: MIUR with various technical modifications related to intracorporeal suturing and ureteroneocystostomy with anti-reflux techniques appears to be as safe and effective for POM in different age groups as the open procedure. Double-J stent insertion should be regarded as a temporary option for infants by achieving internal urinary drainage, as it may present limited success rates and various complications. Endoureterotomy using pure cutting current or laser appears to be a safer, easier, and less invasive alternative to open surgical management. While EBD has emerged as a definite treatment for POM in the pediatric population, it is debatable whether EBD can substitute for MIUR in adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and feasibility of MIUR and endoscopic management in patients from all age groups still need further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9827399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98273992023-01-10 Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes Li, Zhenyu Yang, Kunlin Li, Xinfei Chen, Silu Wang, Xiang Li, Zhihua Li, Xuesong Transl Androl Urol Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary obstructive megaureter (POM) has various courses in different age populations. Although open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) remains the standard treatment for symptomatic POM, it is highly invasive with potential complications. In recent years, minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation (MIUR), including laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (LUR) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR), and endoscopic management, such as double-J stent insertion, endoureterotomy and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD), have been utilized for POM in selected patients. However, few comparable studies between MIUR and endoscopic management have been published to date, and it remains unclear which surgical management is the optimal choice for POM in different age groups. This review provides a comprehensive perspective on technical development and clinical outcomes of MIUR and endoscopic management for POM in pediatric and adult populations. METHODS: The PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to comprehensively search English language articles related to MIUR and endoscopic management for POM in pediatric and adult populations up to March 2022. The technical modifications and the relevant clinical outcomes were reviewed. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: MIUR with various technical modifications related to intracorporeal suturing and ureteroneocystostomy with anti-reflux techniques appears to be as safe and effective for POM in different age groups as the open procedure. Double-J stent insertion should be regarded as a temporary option for infants by achieving internal urinary drainage, as it may present limited success rates and various complications. Endoureterotomy using pure cutting current or laser appears to be a safer, easier, and less invasive alternative to open surgical management. While EBD has emerged as a definite treatment for POM in the pediatric population, it is debatable whether EBD can substitute for MIUR in adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and feasibility of MIUR and endoscopic management in patients from all age groups still need further investigation. AME Publishing Company 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9827399/ /pubmed/36632159 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-448 Text en 2022 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Li, Zhenyu Yang, Kunlin Li, Xinfei Chen, Silu Wang, Xiang Li, Zhihua Li, Xuesong Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
title | Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
title_full | Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
title_short | Minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
title_sort | minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation or endoscopic management for primary obstructive megaureter: a narrative review of technical modifications and clinical outcomes |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632159 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhenyu minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes AT yangkunlin minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes AT lixinfei minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes AT chensilu minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes AT wangxiang minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes AT lizhihua minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes AT lixuesong minimallyinvasiveureteralreimplantationorendoscopicmanagementforprimaryobstructivemegaureteranarrativereviewoftechnicalmodificationsandclinicaloutcomes |