Cargando…

Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals

BACKGROUND: Studies reporting statistically significant effect estimates tend to be more frequently published compared to studies reporting non-significant or equivalent estimates. Consequently, this may lead to distortion of the literature. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seehra, Jadbinder, Khraishi, Hadil, Pandis, Nikolaos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01795-3
_version_ 1784867092756955136
author Seehra, Jadbinder
Khraishi, Hadil
Pandis, Nikolaos
author_facet Seehra, Jadbinder
Khraishi, Hadil
Pandis, Nikolaos
author_sort Seehra, Jadbinder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies reporting statistically significant effect estimates tend to be more frequently published compared to studies reporting non-significant or equivalent estimates. Consequently, this may lead to distortion of the literature. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of reporting statistically significant effect estimates in leading oral health journals and to explore associations between the effect estimates and record characteristics. METHODS: An electronic database search was undertaken of a selection of leading oral health journals including general oral health journals to identify primary oral health records published in 2019. Descriptive statistics and population average GEE logistic regression model was used to assess associations between articles reporting a statistically significant effect estimate and the record characteristics. RESULTS: In 1335 records, 82.4% records reported a statistically significant effect estimate. All speciality journals compared to general oral health journals were less likely to publish a record with significant effect estimates. Authors based in Asia or other (OR 1.49; 95% CI :1.02,2.19; p = 0.037) were more likely to report significant effect estimates compared to those based in Europe. Interventional (OR 0.35; 0.22,0.58; p < 0.001) and observational (OR 0.56; 0.36, 0.89; p = 0.013) records were less likely to report significant effect estimates compared to in-vitro studies. Registered records were less likely to report significant effect estimates when compared to non-registered studies (OR 0.22; 95% CI :0.14,0.32; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The publishing of records with significant effect estimates is prevalent within the oral health literature. To reduce dissemination bias and overestimation of effect sizes in systematic reviews, the publishing of studies with non-significant or equivalent effect estimates should be encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9827647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98276472023-01-10 Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals Seehra, Jadbinder Khraishi, Hadil Pandis, Nikolaos BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Studies reporting statistically significant effect estimates tend to be more frequently published compared to studies reporting non-significant or equivalent estimates. Consequently, this may lead to distortion of the literature. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of reporting statistically significant effect estimates in leading oral health journals and to explore associations between the effect estimates and record characteristics. METHODS: An electronic database search was undertaken of a selection of leading oral health journals including general oral health journals to identify primary oral health records published in 2019. Descriptive statistics and population average GEE logistic regression model was used to assess associations between articles reporting a statistically significant effect estimate and the record characteristics. RESULTS: In 1335 records, 82.4% records reported a statistically significant effect estimate. All speciality journals compared to general oral health journals were less likely to publish a record with significant effect estimates. Authors based in Asia or other (OR 1.49; 95% CI :1.02,2.19; p = 0.037) were more likely to report significant effect estimates compared to those based in Europe. Interventional (OR 0.35; 0.22,0.58; p < 0.001) and observational (OR 0.56; 0.36, 0.89; p = 0.013) records were less likely to report significant effect estimates compared to in-vitro studies. Registered records were less likely to report significant effect estimates when compared to non-registered studies (OR 0.22; 95% CI :0.14,0.32; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The publishing of records with significant effect estimates is prevalent within the oral health literature. To reduce dissemination bias and overestimation of effect sizes in systematic reviews, the publishing of studies with non-significant or equivalent effect estimates should be encouraged. BioMed Central 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9827647/ /pubmed/36624365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01795-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Seehra, Jadbinder
Khraishi, Hadil
Pandis, Nikolaos
Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
title Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
title_full Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
title_fullStr Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
title_full_unstemmed Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
title_short Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
title_sort studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01795-3
work_keys_str_mv AT seehrajadbinder studieswithstatisticallysignificanteffectestimatesaremorefrequentlypublishedcomparedtononsignificantestimatesinoralhealthjournals
AT khraishihadil studieswithstatisticallysignificanteffectestimatesaremorefrequentlypublishedcomparedtononsignificantestimatesinoralhealthjournals
AT pandisnikolaos studieswithstatisticallysignificanteffectestimatesaremorefrequentlypublishedcomparedtononsignificantestimatesinoralhealthjournals