Cargando…
Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals
BACKGROUND: Studies reporting statistically significant effect estimates tend to be more frequently published compared to studies reporting non-significant or equivalent estimates. Consequently, this may lead to distortion of the literature. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of repor...
Autores principales: | Seehra, Jadbinder, Khraishi, Hadil, Pandis, Nikolaos |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01795-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?
por: Koletsi, Despina, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Reporting of flow diagrams in randomised controlled trials published in periodontology and implantology: a survey
por: Meyer, Hanns-Gustav Julius, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A quality assessment of orthodontic patient information leaflets
por: Seehra, Jadbinder, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Clinical evaluation of marketed orthodontic products: are researchers behind the times? A meta-epidemiological study
por: Seehra, Jadbinder, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Clinical evaluation of marketed and non-marketed orthodontic products: are researchers now ahead of the times? A meta-epidemiological study
por: Alhussain, Almaha, et al.
Publicado: (2023)