Cargando…

An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage

Experiments were conducted in an UK inter‐city train carriage with the aim of evaluating the risk of infection to the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus via airborne transmission. The experiments included in‐service CO(2) measurements and the measurement of salt aerosol concentrations released within the carriage. Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodward, Huw, de Kreij, Rick J. B., Kruger, Emily S., Fan, Shiwei, Tiwari, Arvind, Hama, Sarkawt, Noel, Simon, Davies Wykes, Megan S., Kumar, Prashant, Linden, Paul F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.13121
_version_ 1784867135577653248
author Woodward, Huw
de Kreij, Rick J. B.
Kruger, Emily S.
Fan, Shiwei
Tiwari, Arvind
Hama, Sarkawt
Noel, Simon
Davies Wykes, Megan S.
Kumar, Prashant
Linden, Paul F.
author_facet Woodward, Huw
de Kreij, Rick J. B.
Kruger, Emily S.
Fan, Shiwei
Tiwari, Arvind
Hama, Sarkawt
Noel, Simon
Davies Wykes, Megan S.
Kumar, Prashant
Linden, Paul F.
author_sort Woodward, Huw
collection PubMed
description Experiments were conducted in an UK inter‐city train carriage with the aim of evaluating the risk of infection to the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus via airborne transmission. The experiments included in‐service CO(2) measurements and the measurement of salt aerosol concentrations released within the carriage. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carriage airflow were also used to visualise the airflow patterns, and the efficacy of the HVAC filter material was tested in a laboratory. Assuming an infectious person is present, the risk of infection for a 1‐h train journey was estimated to be 6 times lower than for a full day in a well‐ventilated office, or 10–12 times lower than a full day in a poorly ventilated office. While the absolute risk for a typical journey is likely low, in the case where a particularly infectious individual is on‐board, there is the potential for a number of secondary infections to occur during a 1‐h journey. Every effort should therefore be made to minimize the risk of airborne infection within these carriages. Recommendations are also given for the use of CO(2) sensors for the evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission on train carriages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9827851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98278512023-01-10 An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage Woodward, Huw de Kreij, Rick J. B. Kruger, Emily S. Fan, Shiwei Tiwari, Arvind Hama, Sarkawt Noel, Simon Davies Wykes, Megan S. Kumar, Prashant Linden, Paul F. Indoor Air Original Articles Experiments were conducted in an UK inter‐city train carriage with the aim of evaluating the risk of infection to the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus via airborne transmission. The experiments included in‐service CO(2) measurements and the measurement of salt aerosol concentrations released within the carriage. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carriage airflow were also used to visualise the airflow patterns, and the efficacy of the HVAC filter material was tested in a laboratory. Assuming an infectious person is present, the risk of infection for a 1‐h train journey was estimated to be 6 times lower than for a full day in a well‐ventilated office, or 10–12 times lower than a full day in a poorly ventilated office. While the absolute risk for a typical journey is likely low, in the case where a particularly infectious individual is on‐board, there is the potential for a number of secondary infections to occur during a 1‐h journey. Every effort should therefore be made to minimize the risk of airborne infection within these carriages. Recommendations are also given for the use of CO(2) sensors for the evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission on train carriages. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-24 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9827851/ /pubmed/36305073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.13121 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Indoor Air published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Woodward, Huw
de Kreij, Rick J. B.
Kruger, Emily S.
Fan, Shiwei
Tiwari, Arvind
Hama, Sarkawt
Noel, Simon
Davies Wykes, Megan S.
Kumar, Prashant
Linden, Paul F.
An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
title An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
title_full An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
title_fullStr An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
title_short An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
title_sort evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of covid‐19 on an inter‐city train carriage
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.13121
work_keys_str_mv AT woodwardhuw anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT dekreijrickjb anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT krugeremilys anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT fanshiwei anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT tiwariarvind anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT hamasarkawt anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT noelsimon anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT davieswykesmegans anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT kumarprashant anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT lindenpaulf anevaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT woodwardhuw evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT dekreijrickjb evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT krugeremilys evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT fanshiwei evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT tiwariarvind evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT hamasarkawt evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT noelsimon evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT davieswykesmegans evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT kumarprashant evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage
AT lindenpaulf evaluationoftheriskofairbornetransmissionofcovid19onanintercitytraincarriage