Cargando…
Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high‐dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14103 |
_version_ | 1784867217046765568 |
---|---|
author | Opedal, Øystein H. Gross, Karin Chapurlat, Elodie Parachnowitsch, Amy Joffard, Nina Sletvold, Nina Ovaskainen, Otso Friberg, Magne |
author_facet | Opedal, Øystein H. Gross, Karin Chapurlat, Elodie Parachnowitsch, Amy Joffard, Nina Sletvold, Nina Ovaskainen, Otso Friberg, Magne |
author_sort | Opedal, Øystein H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high‐dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent‐mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced‐rank regression to jointly estimate a scent composite trait under selection and the strength of selection acting on this trait. To assess and compare variation in selection on scent across species, time and space, we reanalyse 22 datasets on six species from four previous studies. The results agreed qualitatively with previous analyses in terms of identifying populations and scent compounds subject to stronger selection but also allowed us to evaluate and compare the strength of selection on scent across studies. Doing so revealed that selection on floral scent was highly variable, and overall about as common and as strong as selection on other phenotypic traits involved in pollinator attraction or pollen transfer. These results are consistent with an important role of floral scent in pollinator attraction. Our approach should be useful for further studies of plant–animal communication and for studies of selection on other high‐dimensional phenotypes. In particular, our approach will be useful for studies of pollinator‐mediated selection on complex scent blends comprising many volatiles, and when no prior information on the physiological responses of pollinators to scent compounds is available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9828191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98281912023-01-10 Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent Opedal, Øystein H. Gross, Karin Chapurlat, Elodie Parachnowitsch, Amy Joffard, Nina Sletvold, Nina Ovaskainen, Otso Friberg, Magne J Evol Biol Methods Article Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high‐dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent‐mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced‐rank regression to jointly estimate a scent composite trait under selection and the strength of selection acting on this trait. To assess and compare variation in selection on scent across species, time and space, we reanalyse 22 datasets on six species from four previous studies. The results agreed qualitatively with previous analyses in terms of identifying populations and scent compounds subject to stronger selection but also allowed us to evaluate and compare the strength of selection on scent across studies. Doing so revealed that selection on floral scent was highly variable, and overall about as common and as strong as selection on other phenotypic traits involved in pollinator attraction or pollen transfer. These results are consistent with an important role of floral scent in pollinator attraction. Our approach should be useful for further studies of plant–animal communication and for studies of selection on other high‐dimensional phenotypes. In particular, our approach will be useful for studies of pollinator‐mediated selection on complex scent blends comprising many volatiles, and when no prior information on the physiological responses of pollinators to scent compounds is available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-30 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9828191/ /pubmed/36177776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14103 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Article Opedal, Øystein H. Gross, Karin Chapurlat, Elodie Parachnowitsch, Amy Joffard, Nina Sletvold, Nina Ovaskainen, Otso Friberg, Magne Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
title | Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
title_full | Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
title_fullStr | Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
title_short | Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
title_sort | measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent |
topic | Methods Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opedaløysteinh measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT grosskarin measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT chapurlatelodie measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT parachnowitschamy measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT joffardnina measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT sletvoldnina measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT ovaskainenotso measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent AT fribergmagne measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent |