Cargando…

Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent

Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high‐dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Opedal, Øystein H., Gross, Karin, Chapurlat, Elodie, Parachnowitsch, Amy, Joffard, Nina, Sletvold, Nina, Ovaskainen, Otso, Friberg, Magne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14103
_version_ 1784867217046765568
author Opedal, Øystein H.
Gross, Karin
Chapurlat, Elodie
Parachnowitsch, Amy
Joffard, Nina
Sletvold, Nina
Ovaskainen, Otso
Friberg, Magne
author_facet Opedal, Øystein H.
Gross, Karin
Chapurlat, Elodie
Parachnowitsch, Amy
Joffard, Nina
Sletvold, Nina
Ovaskainen, Otso
Friberg, Magne
author_sort Opedal, Øystein H.
collection PubMed
description Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high‐dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent‐mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced‐rank regression to jointly estimate a scent composite trait under selection and the strength of selection acting on this trait. To assess and compare variation in selection on scent across species, time and space, we reanalyse 22 datasets on six species from four previous studies. The results agreed qualitatively with previous analyses in terms of identifying populations and scent compounds subject to stronger selection but also allowed us to evaluate and compare the strength of selection on scent across studies. Doing so revealed that selection on floral scent was highly variable, and overall about as common and as strong as selection on other phenotypic traits involved in pollinator attraction or pollen transfer. These results are consistent with an important role of floral scent in pollinator attraction. Our approach should be useful for further studies of plant–animal communication and for studies of selection on other high‐dimensional phenotypes. In particular, our approach will be useful for studies of pollinator‐mediated selection on complex scent blends comprising many volatiles, and when no prior information on the physiological responses of pollinators to scent compounds is available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9828191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98281912023-01-10 Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent Opedal, Øystein H. Gross, Karin Chapurlat, Elodie Parachnowitsch, Amy Joffard, Nina Sletvold, Nina Ovaskainen, Otso Friberg, Magne J Evol Biol Methods Article Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high‐dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent‐mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced‐rank regression to jointly estimate a scent composite trait under selection and the strength of selection acting on this trait. To assess and compare variation in selection on scent across species, time and space, we reanalyse 22 datasets on six species from four previous studies. The results agreed qualitatively with previous analyses in terms of identifying populations and scent compounds subject to stronger selection but also allowed us to evaluate and compare the strength of selection on scent across studies. Doing so revealed that selection on floral scent was highly variable, and overall about as common and as strong as selection on other phenotypic traits involved in pollinator attraction or pollen transfer. These results are consistent with an important role of floral scent in pollinator attraction. Our approach should be useful for further studies of plant–animal communication and for studies of selection on other high‐dimensional phenotypes. In particular, our approach will be useful for studies of pollinator‐mediated selection on complex scent blends comprising many volatiles, and when no prior information on the physiological responses of pollinators to scent compounds is available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-30 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9828191/ /pubmed/36177776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14103 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Article
Opedal, Øystein H.
Gross, Karin
Chapurlat, Elodie
Parachnowitsch, Amy
Joffard, Nina
Sletvold, Nina
Ovaskainen, Otso
Friberg, Magne
Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
title Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
title_full Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
title_fullStr Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
title_full_unstemmed Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
title_short Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
title_sort measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent
topic Methods Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14103
work_keys_str_mv AT opedaløysteinh measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT grosskarin measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT chapurlatelodie measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT parachnowitschamy measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT joffardnina measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT sletvoldnina measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT ovaskainenotso measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent
AT fribergmagne measuringcomparingandinterpretingphenotypicselectiononfloralscent