Cargando…
Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
Ecosystems remain under enormous pressure from multiple anthropogenic stressors. Manipulative experiments evaluating stressor interactions and impacts mostly apply stressors under static conditions without considering how variable stressor intensity (i.e. fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e. timing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14120 |
_version_ | 1784867232601341952 |
---|---|
author | Ostrowski, Andria Connolly, Rod M. Brown, Christopher J. Sievers, Michael |
author_facet | Ostrowski, Andria Connolly, Rod M. Brown, Christopher J. Sievers, Michael |
author_sort | Ostrowski, Andria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ecosystems remain under enormous pressure from multiple anthropogenic stressors. Manipulative experiments evaluating stressor interactions and impacts mostly apply stressors under static conditions without considering how variable stressor intensity (i.e. fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e. timing of fluctuations) affect biological responses. We ask how variable stressor intensity and synchronicity, and interaction type, can influence how multiple stressors affect seagrass. At the highest intensities, fluctuating stressors applied asynchronously reduced seagrass biomass 36% more than for static stressors, yet no such difference occurred for photosynthetic capacity. Testing three separate hypotheses to predict underlying drivers of differences in biological responses highlighted alternative modes of action dependent on how stressors fluctuated over time. Given that environmental conditions are constantly changing, assessing static stressors may lead to inaccurate predictions of cumulative effects. Translating multiple stressor experiments to the real world, therefore, requires considering variability in stressor intensity and the synchronicity of fluctuations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9828260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98282602023-01-10 Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts Ostrowski, Andria Connolly, Rod M. Brown, Christopher J. Sievers, Michael Ecol Lett Letters Ecosystems remain under enormous pressure from multiple anthropogenic stressors. Manipulative experiments evaluating stressor interactions and impacts mostly apply stressors under static conditions without considering how variable stressor intensity (i.e. fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e. timing of fluctuations) affect biological responses. We ask how variable stressor intensity and synchronicity, and interaction type, can influence how multiple stressors affect seagrass. At the highest intensities, fluctuating stressors applied asynchronously reduced seagrass biomass 36% more than for static stressors, yet no such difference occurred for photosynthetic capacity. Testing three separate hypotheses to predict underlying drivers of differences in biological responses highlighted alternative modes of action dependent on how stressors fluctuated over time. Given that environmental conditions are constantly changing, assessing static stressors may lead to inaccurate predictions of cumulative effects. Translating multiple stressor experiments to the real world, therefore, requires considering variability in stressor intensity and the synchronicity of fluctuations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-11 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9828260/ /pubmed/36217804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14120 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Letters Ostrowski, Andria Connolly, Rod M. Brown, Christopher J. Sievers, Michael Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
title | Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
title_full | Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
title_fullStr | Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
title_short | Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
title_sort | fluctuating fortunes: stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts |
topic | Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ostrowskiandria fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts AT connollyrodm fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts AT brownchristopherj fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts AT sieversmichael fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts |