Cargando…

Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts

Ecosystems remain under enormous pressure from multiple anthropogenic stressors. Manipulative experiments evaluating stressor interactions and impacts mostly apply stressors under static conditions without considering how variable stressor intensity (i.e. fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e. timing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostrowski, Andria, Connolly, Rod M., Brown, Christopher J., Sievers, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14120
_version_ 1784867232601341952
author Ostrowski, Andria
Connolly, Rod M.
Brown, Christopher J.
Sievers, Michael
author_facet Ostrowski, Andria
Connolly, Rod M.
Brown, Christopher J.
Sievers, Michael
author_sort Ostrowski, Andria
collection PubMed
description Ecosystems remain under enormous pressure from multiple anthropogenic stressors. Manipulative experiments evaluating stressor interactions and impacts mostly apply stressors under static conditions without considering how variable stressor intensity (i.e. fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e. timing of fluctuations) affect biological responses. We ask how variable stressor intensity and synchronicity, and interaction type, can influence how multiple stressors affect seagrass. At the highest intensities, fluctuating stressors applied asynchronously reduced seagrass biomass 36% more than for static stressors, yet no such difference occurred for photosynthetic capacity. Testing three separate hypotheses to predict underlying drivers of differences in biological responses highlighted alternative modes of action dependent on how stressors fluctuated over time. Given that environmental conditions are constantly changing, assessing static stressors may lead to inaccurate predictions of cumulative effects. Translating multiple stressor experiments to the real world, therefore, requires considering variability in stressor intensity and the synchronicity of fluctuations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9828260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98282602023-01-10 Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts Ostrowski, Andria Connolly, Rod M. Brown, Christopher J. Sievers, Michael Ecol Lett Letters Ecosystems remain under enormous pressure from multiple anthropogenic stressors. Manipulative experiments evaluating stressor interactions and impacts mostly apply stressors under static conditions without considering how variable stressor intensity (i.e. fluctuations) and synchronicity (i.e. timing of fluctuations) affect biological responses. We ask how variable stressor intensity and synchronicity, and interaction type, can influence how multiple stressors affect seagrass. At the highest intensities, fluctuating stressors applied asynchronously reduced seagrass biomass 36% more than for static stressors, yet no such difference occurred for photosynthetic capacity. Testing three separate hypotheses to predict underlying drivers of differences in biological responses highlighted alternative modes of action dependent on how stressors fluctuated over time. Given that environmental conditions are constantly changing, assessing static stressors may lead to inaccurate predictions of cumulative effects. Translating multiple stressor experiments to the real world, therefore, requires considering variability in stressor intensity and the synchronicity of fluctuations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-11 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9828260/ /pubmed/36217804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14120 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Letters
Ostrowski, Andria
Connolly, Rod M.
Brown, Christopher J.
Sievers, Michael
Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
title Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
title_full Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
title_fullStr Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
title_full_unstemmed Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
title_short Fluctuating fortunes: Stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
title_sort fluctuating fortunes: stressor synchronicity and fluctuating intensity influence biological impacts
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.14120
work_keys_str_mv AT ostrowskiandria fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts
AT connollyrodm fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts
AT brownchristopherj fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts
AT sieversmichael fluctuatingfortunesstressorsynchronicityandfluctuatingintensityinfluencebiologicalimpacts