Cargando…
The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference
While influences of Pavlovian associations on instrumental behaviour are well established, we still do not know how motor actions affect the formation of Pavlovian associations. To address this question, we designed a task in which participants were presented with neutral stimuli, half of which were...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15826 |
_version_ | 1784867233857536000 |
---|---|
author | Bikute, Kotryna Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline Beyer, Frederike |
author_facet | Bikute, Kotryna Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline Beyer, Frederike |
author_sort | Bikute, Kotryna |
collection | PubMed |
description | While influences of Pavlovian associations on instrumental behaviour are well established, we still do not know how motor actions affect the formation of Pavlovian associations. To address this question, we designed a task in which participants were presented with neutral stimuli, half of which were paired with an active response, half with a passive waiting period. Stimuli had an 80% chance of predicting either a monetary gain or loss. We compared the feedback‐related negativity (FRN) in response to predictive stimuli and outcomes, as well as directed phase synchronization before and after outcome presentation between trials with versus without a motor response. We found a larger FRN amplitude in response to outcomes presented after a motor response (active trials). This effect was driven by a positive deflection in active reward trials, which was absent in passive reward trials. Connectivity analysis revealed that the motor action reversed the direction of the phase synchronization at the time of the feedback presentation: Top‐down information flow during the outcome anticipation phase in active trials, but bottom‐up information flow in passive trials. This main effect of action was mirrored in behavioural data showing that participants preferred stimuli associated with an active response. Our findings suggest an influence of neural systems that initiate motor actions on neural systems involved in reward processing. We suggest that motor actions might modulate the brain responses to feedback by affecting the dynamics of brain activity towards optimizing the processing of the resulting action outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9828266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98282662023-01-10 The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference Bikute, Kotryna Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline Beyer, Frederike Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience While influences of Pavlovian associations on instrumental behaviour are well established, we still do not know how motor actions affect the formation of Pavlovian associations. To address this question, we designed a task in which participants were presented with neutral stimuli, half of which were paired with an active response, half with a passive waiting period. Stimuli had an 80% chance of predicting either a monetary gain or loss. We compared the feedback‐related negativity (FRN) in response to predictive stimuli and outcomes, as well as directed phase synchronization before and after outcome presentation between trials with versus without a motor response. We found a larger FRN amplitude in response to outcomes presented after a motor response (active trials). This effect was driven by a positive deflection in active reward trials, which was absent in passive reward trials. Connectivity analysis revealed that the motor action reversed the direction of the phase synchronization at the time of the feedback presentation: Top‐down information flow during the outcome anticipation phase in active trials, but bottom‐up information flow in passive trials. This main effect of action was mirrored in behavioural data showing that participants preferred stimuli associated with an active response. Our findings suggest an influence of neural systems that initiate motor actions on neural systems involved in reward processing. We suggest that motor actions might modulate the brain responses to feedback by affecting the dynamics of brain activity towards optimizing the processing of the resulting action outcome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-27 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9828266/ /pubmed/36114689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15826 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Cognitive Neuroscience Bikute, Kotryna Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline Beyer, Frederike The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
title | The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
title_full | The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
title_fullStr | The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
title_short | The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
title_sort | value of an action: impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference |
topic | Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bikutekotryna thevalueofanactionimpactofmotorbehaviouronoutcomeprocessingandstimuluspreference AT dibernardiluftcaroline thevalueofanactionimpactofmotorbehaviouronoutcomeprocessingandstimuluspreference AT beyerfrederike thevalueofanactionimpactofmotorbehaviouronoutcomeprocessingandstimuluspreference AT bikutekotryna valueofanactionimpactofmotorbehaviouronoutcomeprocessingandstimuluspreference AT dibernardiluftcaroline valueofanactionimpactofmotorbehaviouronoutcomeprocessingandstimuluspreference AT beyerfrederike valueofanactionimpactofmotorbehaviouronoutcomeprocessingandstimuluspreference |