Two Directing Groups Used for Metal Catalysed Meta‐C−H Functionalisation Only Effect Ortho Electrophilic C−H Borylation

Two templates used in meta‐directed C−H functionalisation under metal catalysis do not direct meta‐C−H borylation under electrophilic borylation conditions. Using BCl(3) only Lewis adduct formation with Lewis basic sites in the template is observed. While combining BBr(3) and the template containing an amide linker only led to amide directed ortho C−H borylation, with no pyridyl directed meta borylation. The amide directed borylation is selective for the ortho borylation of the aniline derived unit in the template, with no ortho borylation of the phenylacetyl ring – which would also form a six membered boracycle – observed. In the absence of other aromatics amide directed ortho borylation on to phenylacetyl rings can be achieved. The absence of meta‐borylation using two templates indicates a higher barrier to pyridyl directed meta borylation relative to amide directed ortho borylation and suggests that bespoke templates for enabling meta‐directed electrophilic borylation may be required.