Cargando…

Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for automatic selection of the slice of minimal hiatal dimensions (SMHD) and segmentation of the urogenital hiatus (UH) in transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) volumes. METHODS: Manual selection of the SMHD and segmentation of the UH was performed in TPUS volumes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Noort, F., Manzini, C., van der Vaart, C. H., van Limbeek, M. A. J., Slump, C. H., Grob, A. T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24810
_version_ 1784867284762755072
author van den Noort, F.
Manzini, C.
van der Vaart, C. H.
van Limbeek, M. A. J.
Slump, C. H.
Grob, A. T. M.
author_facet van den Noort, F.
Manzini, C.
van der Vaart, C. H.
van Limbeek, M. A. J.
Slump, C. H.
Grob, A. T. M.
author_sort van den Noort, F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for automatic selection of the slice of minimal hiatal dimensions (SMHD) and segmentation of the urogenital hiatus (UH) in transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) volumes. METHODS: Manual selection of the SMHD and segmentation of the UH was performed in TPUS volumes of 116 women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). These data were used to train two deep‐learning algorithms. The first algorithm was trained to provide an estimation of the position of the SMHD. Based on this estimation, a slice was selected and fed into the second algorithm, which performed automatic segmentation of the UH. From this segmentation, measurements of the UH area (UHA), anteroposterior diameter (APD) and coronal diameter (CD) were computed automatically. The mean absolute distance between manually and automatically selected SMHD, the overlap (dice similarity index (DSI)) between manual and automatic UH segmentation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between manual and automatic UH measurements were assessed on a test set of 30 TPUS volumes. RESULTS: The mean absolute distance between manually and automatically selected SMHD was 0.20 cm. All DSI values between manual and automatic UH segmentations were above 0.85. The ICC values between manual and automatic UH measurements were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97) for UHA, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.78–0.97) for APD and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–0.91) for CD, demonstrating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep‐learning algorithms allowed reliable automatic selection of the SMHD and UH segmentation in TPUS volumes of women with symptomatic POP. These algorithms can be implemented in the software of TPUS machines, thus reducing clinical analysis time and simplifying the examination of TPUS data for research and clinical purposes. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9828486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98284862023-01-10 Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes van den Noort, F. Manzini, C. van der Vaart, C. H. van Limbeek, M. A. J. Slump, C. H. Grob, A. T. M. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for automatic selection of the slice of minimal hiatal dimensions (SMHD) and segmentation of the urogenital hiatus (UH) in transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) volumes. METHODS: Manual selection of the SMHD and segmentation of the UH was performed in TPUS volumes of 116 women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). These data were used to train two deep‐learning algorithms. The first algorithm was trained to provide an estimation of the position of the SMHD. Based on this estimation, a slice was selected and fed into the second algorithm, which performed automatic segmentation of the UH. From this segmentation, measurements of the UH area (UHA), anteroposterior diameter (APD) and coronal diameter (CD) were computed automatically. The mean absolute distance between manually and automatically selected SMHD, the overlap (dice similarity index (DSI)) between manual and automatic UH segmentation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between manual and automatic UH measurements were assessed on a test set of 30 TPUS volumes. RESULTS: The mean absolute distance between manually and automatically selected SMHD was 0.20 cm. All DSI values between manual and automatic UH segmentations were above 0.85. The ICC values between manual and automatic UH measurements were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97) for UHA, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.78–0.97) for APD and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–0.91) for CD, demonstrating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep‐learning algorithms allowed reliable automatic selection of the SMHD and UH segmentation in TPUS volumes of women with symptomatic POP. These algorithms can be implemented in the software of TPUS machines, thus reducing clinical analysis time and simplifying the examination of TPUS data for research and clinical purposes. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2022-10-02 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9828486/ /pubmed/34767663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24810 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Papers
van den Noort, F.
Manzini, C.
van der Vaart, C. H.
van Limbeek, M. A. J.
Slump, C. H.
Grob, A. T. M.
Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
title Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
title_full Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
title_fullStr Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
title_full_unstemmed Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
title_short Automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
title_sort automatic identification and segmentation of slice of minimal hiatal dimensions in transperineal ultrasound volumes
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9828486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24810
work_keys_str_mv AT vandennoortf automaticidentificationandsegmentationofsliceofminimalhiataldimensionsintransperinealultrasoundvolumes
AT manzinic automaticidentificationandsegmentationofsliceofminimalhiataldimensionsintransperinealultrasoundvolumes
AT vandervaartch automaticidentificationandsegmentationofsliceofminimalhiataldimensionsintransperinealultrasoundvolumes
AT vanlimbeekmaj automaticidentificationandsegmentationofsliceofminimalhiataldimensionsintransperinealultrasoundvolumes
AT slumpch automaticidentificationandsegmentationofsliceofminimalhiataldimensionsintransperinealultrasoundvolumes
AT grobatm automaticidentificationandsegmentationofsliceofminimalhiataldimensionsintransperinealultrasoundvolumes