Cargando…

Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients

Following the removal of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), reassessment of the need for a new device is vital. Some patients may have exhibited an improvement in rhythm or cardiac function and may thus no longer meet the guideline requirements for reimplantation. However, the lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Wencheng, Ze, Feng, Yang, Dandan, Li, Ding, Zhou, Xu, Yuan, Cuizhen, Li, Xuebin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mi.2021.11
_version_ 1784867400857944064
author Zheng, Wencheng
Ze, Feng
Yang, Dandan
Li, Ding
Zhou, Xu
Yuan, Cuizhen
Li, Xuebin
author_facet Zheng, Wencheng
Ze, Feng
Yang, Dandan
Li, Ding
Zhou, Xu
Yuan, Cuizhen
Li, Xuebin
author_sort Zheng, Wencheng
collection PubMed
description Following the removal of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), reassessment of the need for a new device is vital. Some patients may have exhibited an improvement in rhythm or cardiac function and may thus no longer meet the guideline requirements for reimplantation. However, the long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation remain unknown. In the present study, it was hypothesized that the implantation of pacing systems in selected patients following lead extraction is safe. In order to confirm this hypothesis, a total of 854 patients (aged between 28 and 82 years) who underwent the removal of a CIED were enrolled in the present study and they were all reassessed to determine whether a new device following lead extraction was necessary. In order to determine which patients would undergo non-systematic device reimplantation, the standard guidelines, the criteria and the wishes of the patient were all taken into consideration. Patients remained device-free unless an adverse clinical event occurred that required reimplantation. The primary study endpoint was the rate of sudden death or reimplantation. Between January, 2014 and December, 2019, 854 consecutive patients underwent pacing system extraction, of whom 210 patients (24.6%) underwent non-systematic device reimplantation following careful reassessment (the non-reimplantation group). Among the 210 patients, 162 (77.1%) were fitted with pacemakers, 26 (12.4%) underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator and 22 (10.5%) were implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator. During a mean follow-up period of 40.4 months, 86 patients reached the primary endpoint of the study, including 54 out of 210 patients (25.7%) who experienced an adverse clinical event that required reimplantation and 32 out of 210 patients (15.2%) who experienced sudden death. Reimplantation of a new device was not required in ~25% of the patients. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that following pacing system removal, non-systematic device reimplantation associated with close surveillance is safe for selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9829079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98290792023-01-24 Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients Zheng, Wencheng Ze, Feng Yang, Dandan Li, Ding Zhou, Xu Yuan, Cuizhen Li, Xuebin Med Int (Lond) Articles Following the removal of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), reassessment of the need for a new device is vital. Some patients may have exhibited an improvement in rhythm or cardiac function and may thus no longer meet the guideline requirements for reimplantation. However, the long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation remain unknown. In the present study, it was hypothesized that the implantation of pacing systems in selected patients following lead extraction is safe. In order to confirm this hypothesis, a total of 854 patients (aged between 28 and 82 years) who underwent the removal of a CIED were enrolled in the present study and they were all reassessed to determine whether a new device following lead extraction was necessary. In order to determine which patients would undergo non-systematic device reimplantation, the standard guidelines, the criteria and the wishes of the patient were all taken into consideration. Patients remained device-free unless an adverse clinical event occurred that required reimplantation. The primary study endpoint was the rate of sudden death or reimplantation. Between January, 2014 and December, 2019, 854 consecutive patients underwent pacing system extraction, of whom 210 patients (24.6%) underwent non-systematic device reimplantation following careful reassessment (the non-reimplantation group). Among the 210 patients, 162 (77.1%) were fitted with pacemakers, 26 (12.4%) underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator and 22 (10.5%) were implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator. During a mean follow-up period of 40.4 months, 86 patients reached the primary endpoint of the study, including 54 out of 210 patients (25.7%) who experienced an adverse clinical event that required reimplantation and 32 out of 210 patients (15.2%) who experienced sudden death. Reimplantation of a new device was not required in ~25% of the patients. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that following pacing system removal, non-systematic device reimplantation associated with close surveillance is safe for selected patients. D.A. Spandidos 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9829079/ /pubmed/36698430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mi.2021.11 Text en Copyright: © Zheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zheng, Wencheng
Ze, Feng
Yang, Dandan
Li, Ding
Zhou, Xu
Yuan, Cuizhen
Li, Xuebin
Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
title Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
title_full Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
title_short Long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
title_sort long-term outcomes of non-systematic device reimplantation following lead extraction in selected patients
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mi.2021.11
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengwencheng longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients
AT zefeng longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients
AT yangdandan longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients
AT liding longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients
AT zhouxu longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients
AT yuancuizhen longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients
AT lixuebin longtermoutcomesofnonsystematicdevicereimplantationfollowingleadextractioninselectedpatients