Cargando…

Effects of different force directions of intra-oral skeletally anchored maxillary protraction on craniomaxillofacial complex, in Class III malocclusion: a 3D finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION: The intra-oral skeletally anchored maxillary protraction (I-SAMP) has been found to be an effective treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion. OBJECTIVE: This in-silico study explored the influence of different force directions of intra-oral skeletally anchored Class III elastics o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	GARG, Dhiraj, RAI, Priyank, TRIPATHI, Tulika, KANASE, Anup
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Dental Press International 2023
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36629626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.5.e2220377.oar

Ejemplares similares

Biomechanical effects of Skeletally anchored Class III elastics on the maxillofacial complex: a 3D finite element analysis
por: Rai, Priyank, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A comparative evaluation of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with skeletal anchored and conventional facemask protraction therapy
por: Tripathi, Tulika, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Individualized 3D-Printed Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction Device for Growth Modification in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
por: Kim, Minji, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study
por: Kalra, Shilpa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review
por: Kamath, Apoorva, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical effectiveness of different types of bone-anchored maxillary protraction devices for skeletal Class III malocclusion: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Wang, Jiangwei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Skeletal Changes in Growing Cleft Patients with Class III Malocclusion Treated with Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction—A 3.5-Year Follow-Up
por: Steegman, Ralph M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion
por: Liang, Shuran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Orthopedic and Nonsurgical Orthodontic Treatment of Adolescent Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction and Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Case Report
por: Alnefaie, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Serum IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their ratio: Potential biochemical growth maturity indicators
por: Jain, Nimisha, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction
por: Azamian, Zeinab, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment
por: Ngan, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Management of skeletal Cl III malocclusion using simultaneous alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and facemask protraction in adolescence
por: Singh, Harpreet, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Maxillary protraction and vertical control utilizing skeletal anchorage for midfacial-maxillary deficiency
por: MATSUMOTO, Kensuke, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis
por: Zhang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Management of skeletal Class III with facial asymmetry using skeletal anchorage: 4-year follow-up
por: Tripathi, Tulika, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Dentofacial effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction on prepubertal children with maxillary deficiency: a randomized controlled trial
por: Kamel, Ahmed Mohamed, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
por: Adel, Samar M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A Retrospective Evaluation of Conventional Rapid Maxillary Expansion versus Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction Protocol Combined with Protraction Headgear in the Management of Developing Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
por: Parayaruthottam, Prathapan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients
por: Esenlik, Elçin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prevalence of maxillary canine impaction in skeletal Class III malocclusions compared to Class I malocclusions
por: Di Carlo, Gabriele, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Maxillary protraction after surgically assisted maxillary expansion
por: FURQUIM, Laurindo Zanco, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Stresses in the midpalatal suture in the maxillary protraction therapy: a 3D finite element analysis
por: Tanaka, Orlando M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Maxillary Protraction: A Bibliometric Analysis
por: Si, Minmin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Stress on facial skin of class III subjects during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis
por: Gazzani, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Protraction Using Diverse Modes of Rapid Palatal Expansion
por: Balakrishnan, Rajkumar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

3D Printed Customized Facemask for Maxillary Protraction in the Early Treatment of a Class III Malocclusion: Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case
por: Franchi, Lorenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comparison of maxillary sinus diameters in Chinese and Yemeni patients with skeletal malocclusion
por: Albarakani, Abduljabbar Yahya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus
por: Zhang, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Data Set For Computation Of Maxillary Arch Perimeter With Ramanujan's Equation For Ellipse In Different Skeletal Malocclusions.
por: Singaraju, Gowri Sankar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
por: Fakharian, Mehrnaz, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review
por: Alhammadi, Maged S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Osteocalcin and serum insulin-like growth factor-1 as biochemical skeletal maturity indicators
por: Tripathi, Tulika, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Facemask performance during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis (FEA) evaluation of load and stress distribution on Delaire facemask
por: Gazzani, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial
por: de Souza, Ricardo Alves, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the relationship between masticatory performance and skeletal malocclusion
por: Park, Jung-Chul, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination
por: Nienkemper, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction using palatal plates: A three-dimensional finite element analysis
por: Eom, Jusuk, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Three-dimensional changes in the upper airway and craniomaxillofacial morphology of patients with Angle Class III malocclusion treated with a Frankel III appliance
por: Liu, Yinan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Management of Class II malocclusion with ectopic maxillary canines
por: Mascarenhas, Rohan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_tpjbkf0jpei7iu02p4k6vsgni5