Cargando…
Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask
The spread of Corona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19) in Indonesia is still relatively high and has not shown a significant decrease. One of the main reasons is due to the lack of supervision on the implementation of health protocols such as wearing masks in daily activities. Recently, state-of-the-art a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.110 |
_version_ | 1784867465569763328 |
---|---|
author | Ramadhan, M. Vickya Muchtar, Kahlil Nurdin, Yudha Oktiana, Maulisa Fitria, Maya Maulina, Novi Elwirehardja, Gregorius Natanael Pardamean, Bens |
author_facet | Ramadhan, M. Vickya Muchtar, Kahlil Nurdin, Yudha Oktiana, Maulisa Fitria, Maya Maulina, Novi Elwirehardja, Gregorius Natanael Pardamean, Bens |
author_sort | Ramadhan, M. Vickya |
collection | PubMed |
description | The spread of Corona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19) in Indonesia is still relatively high and has not shown a significant decrease. One of the main reasons is due to the lack of supervision on the implementation of health protocols such as wearing masks in daily activities. Recently, state-of-the-art algorithms were introduced to automate face mask detection. To be more specific, the researchers developed various kinds of architectures for the detection of masks based on computer vision methods. This paper aims to evaluate well-known architectures, namely the ResNet50, VGG11, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB4, and YOLO (You Only Look Once) to recommend the best approach in this specific field. By using the MaskedFace-Net dataset, the experimental results showed that the EfficientNetB4 architecture has better accuracy at 95.77% compared to the YOLOv4 architecture of 93.40%, InceptionV3 of 87.30%, YOLOv3 of 86.35%, ResNet50 of 84.41%, VGG11 of 84.38%, and YOLOv2 of 78.75%, respectively. It should be noted that particularly for YOLO, the model was trained using a collection of MaskedFace-Net images that had been pre-processed and labelled for the task. The model was initially able to train faster with pre-trained weights from the COCO dataset thanks to transfer learning, resulting in a robust set of features expected for face mask detection and classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9829426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98294262023-01-10 Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask Ramadhan, M. Vickya Muchtar, Kahlil Nurdin, Yudha Oktiana, Maulisa Fitria, Maya Maulina, Novi Elwirehardja, Gregorius Natanael Pardamean, Bens Procedia Comput Sci Article The spread of Corona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19) in Indonesia is still relatively high and has not shown a significant decrease. One of the main reasons is due to the lack of supervision on the implementation of health protocols such as wearing masks in daily activities. Recently, state-of-the-art algorithms were introduced to automate face mask detection. To be more specific, the researchers developed various kinds of architectures for the detection of masks based on computer vision methods. This paper aims to evaluate well-known architectures, namely the ResNet50, VGG11, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB4, and YOLO (You Only Look Once) to recommend the best approach in this specific field. By using the MaskedFace-Net dataset, the experimental results showed that the EfficientNetB4 architecture has better accuracy at 95.77% compared to the YOLOv4 architecture of 93.40%, InceptionV3 of 87.30%, YOLOv3 of 86.35%, ResNet50 of 84.41%, VGG11 of 84.38%, and YOLOv2 of 78.75%, respectively. It should be noted that particularly for YOLO, the model was trained using a collection of MaskedFace-Net images that had been pre-processed and labelled for the task. The model was initially able to train faster with pre-trained weights from the COCO dataset thanks to transfer learning, resulting in a robust set of features expected for face mask detection and classification. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9829426/ /pubmed/36643177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.110 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Ramadhan, M. Vickya Muchtar, Kahlil Nurdin, Yudha Oktiana, Maulisa Fitria, Maya Maulina, Novi Elwirehardja, Gregorius Natanael Pardamean, Bens Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
title | Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
title_full | Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
title_short | Comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
title_sort | comparative analysis of deep learning models for detecting face mask |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramadhanmvickya comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT muchtarkahlil comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT nurdinyudha comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT oktianamaulisa comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT fitriamaya comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT maulinanovi comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT elwirehardjagregoriusnatanael comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask AT pardameanbens comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningmodelsfordetectingfacemask |