Cargando…
Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to examine patients’ perceptions of functional health. Most studies compare the responsiveness of each type of questionnaire. However, reports of patient preferences among PROMs commonly used with patients with hand/wrist injuries...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00681-4 |
_version_ | 1784867560974450688 |
---|---|
author | Chanthana, Phongniwath Atthakomol, Pichitchai Manosroi, Worapaka Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kraisarin, Jirachart Sananpanich, Kanit |
author_facet | Chanthana, Phongniwath Atthakomol, Pichitchai Manosroi, Worapaka Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kraisarin, Jirachart Sananpanich, Kanit |
author_sort | Chanthana, Phongniwath |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to examine patients’ perceptions of functional health. Most studies compare the responsiveness of each type of questionnaire. However, reports of patient preferences among PROMs commonly used with patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders are limited. This study aimed to compare patient preferences, factors associated with those preferences and responsiveness among the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and EQ-5D in patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study collected data on 183 patients with hand/wrist injuries or diseases who had visited a hand/wrist outpatient clinic or were hospitalized for surgery between 2017 and 2020. Patients had to be at least 18 years old and able to complete the four questionnaires included in the study. The four PROMs (DASH, MHQ, PRWHE and EQ-5D) were administered to the patients prior to treatment. After completing the questionnaires, patients were asked to answer two open-ended questions regarding their preferences. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors related to patient preferences. Results are presented as the relative risk ratio (RRR). The standardized response mean (SRM) was used to evaluate questionnaire responsiveness. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients, most preferred the PRWHE questionnaire (n = 74, 41%), with the main reasons cited being “specific to injuries/diseases and reflects hand/wrist function (n = 23, 31%)” and “easy to complete (n = 22, 30%).” Sex was found to be associated with patient preference after adjusting for demographic data and reasons for choosing a PROM as confounders (RRR = 0.46, P value = 0.049). The PRWHE had the highest SRM, followed by DASH (0.92 and 0.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The PRWHE is the most preferred by patients and is the most responsive questionnaire. It is recommended for use in clinical practice in situations where a clinician would like to use only one PROM for evaluating patients with various types of hand/wrist problems. Level of evidence: Prognostic III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9829933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98299332023-01-11 Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders Chanthana, Phongniwath Atthakomol, Pichitchai Manosroi, Worapaka Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kraisarin, Jirachart Sananpanich, Kanit J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to examine patients’ perceptions of functional health. Most studies compare the responsiveness of each type of questionnaire. However, reports of patient preferences among PROMs commonly used with patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders are limited. This study aimed to compare patient preferences, factors associated with those preferences and responsiveness among the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and EQ-5D in patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study collected data on 183 patients with hand/wrist injuries or diseases who had visited a hand/wrist outpatient clinic or were hospitalized for surgery between 2017 and 2020. Patients had to be at least 18 years old and able to complete the four questionnaires included in the study. The four PROMs (DASH, MHQ, PRWHE and EQ-5D) were administered to the patients prior to treatment. After completing the questionnaires, patients were asked to answer two open-ended questions regarding their preferences. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors related to patient preferences. Results are presented as the relative risk ratio (RRR). The standardized response mean (SRM) was used to evaluate questionnaire responsiveness. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients, most preferred the PRWHE questionnaire (n = 74, 41%), with the main reasons cited being “specific to injuries/diseases and reflects hand/wrist function (n = 23, 31%)” and “easy to complete (n = 22, 30%).” Sex was found to be associated with patient preference after adjusting for demographic data and reasons for choosing a PROM as confounders (RRR = 0.46, P value = 0.049). The PRWHE had the highest SRM, followed by DASH (0.92 and 0.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The PRWHE is the most preferred by patients and is the most responsive questionnaire. It is recommended for use in clinical practice in situations where a clinician would like to use only one PROM for evaluating patients with various types of hand/wrist problems. Level of evidence: Prognostic III. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-09 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9829933/ /pubmed/36622514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00681-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chanthana, Phongniwath Atthakomol, Pichitchai Manosroi, Worapaka Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kraisarin, Jirachart Sananpanich, Kanit Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
title | Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
title_full | Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
title_fullStr | Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
title_short | Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
title_sort | comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00681-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanthanaphongniwath comparisonofpatientpreferencesandresponsivenessamongcommonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforhandwristinjuriesordisorders AT atthakomolpichitchai comparisonofpatientpreferencesandresponsivenessamongcommonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforhandwristinjuriesordisorders AT manosroiworapaka comparisonofpatientpreferencesandresponsivenessamongcommonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforhandwristinjuriesordisorders AT wongpakarantinakon comparisonofpatientpreferencesandresponsivenessamongcommonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforhandwristinjuriesordisorders AT kraisarinjirachart comparisonofpatientpreferencesandresponsivenessamongcommonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforhandwristinjuriesordisorders AT sananpanichkanit comparisonofpatientpreferencesandresponsivenessamongcommonpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforhandwristinjuriesordisorders |