Cargando…

Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Optimising exercise prescription in heart failure (HF) with a preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction is clinically important. As such, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare traditional moderate intensity training (MIT) against combined aerobic and resistance traini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Jamie, Shanmugam, Nesan, Ray, Robin, Jouhra, Fadi, Mancio, Jennifer, Wiles, Jonathan, Marciniak, Anna, Sharma, Rajan, O’Driscoll, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00549-1
_version_ 1784867562440359936
author Edwards, Jamie
Shanmugam, Nesan
Ray, Robin
Jouhra, Fadi
Mancio, Jennifer
Wiles, Jonathan
Marciniak, Anna
Sharma, Rajan
O’Driscoll, Jamie
author_facet Edwards, Jamie
Shanmugam, Nesan
Ray, Robin
Jouhra, Fadi
Mancio, Jennifer
Wiles, Jonathan
Marciniak, Anna
Sharma, Rajan
O’Driscoll, Jamie
author_sort Edwards, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimising exercise prescription in heart failure (HF) with a preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction is clinically important. As such, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare traditional moderate intensity training (MIT) against combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for improving aerobic capacity (VO(2)), as well as other clinically relevant parameters. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search was performed to identify randomised controlled trials published between 1990 and May 2021. Research trials reporting the effects of MIT against CT or HIIT on peak VO(2) in HFpEF or HFrEF were considered. Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and various markers of diastolic function were also analysed. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis, 4 of which compared MIT against CT and 13 compared MIT against HIIT. There were no significant differences between MIT and CT for peak VO(2) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.521 ml min(−1) kg(−1), [95% CI] =  − 0.7 to 1.8, P(fixed) = 0.412) or LVEF (WMD: − 1.129%, [95% CI] =  − 3.8 to 1.5, P(fixed) = 0.408). However, HIIT was significantly more effective than MIT at improving peak VO(2) (WMD: 1.62 ml min(−1) kg(−1), [95% CI] = 0.6–2.6, P(random) = 0.002) and LVEF (WMD: 3.24%, [95% CI] = 1.7–4.8, P(random) < 0.001) in HF patients. When dichotomized by HF phenotype, HIIT remained significantly more effective than MIT in all analyses except for peak VO(2) in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT is significantly more effective than MIT for improving peak VO(2) and LVEF in HF patients. With the exception of peak VO(2) in HFpEF, these findings remain consistent in both phenotypes. Separately, there is no difference in peak VO(2) and LVEF change following MIT or CT, suggesting that the addition of resistance exercise does not inhibit aerobic adaptations in HF. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00549-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9829948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98299482023-01-11 Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Edwards, Jamie Shanmugam, Nesan Ray, Robin Jouhra, Fadi Mancio, Jennifer Wiles, Jonathan Marciniak, Anna Sharma, Rajan O’Driscoll, Jamie Sports Med Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Optimising exercise prescription in heart failure (HF) with a preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction is clinically important. As such, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare traditional moderate intensity training (MIT) against combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for improving aerobic capacity (VO(2)), as well as other clinically relevant parameters. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search was performed to identify randomised controlled trials published between 1990 and May 2021. Research trials reporting the effects of MIT against CT or HIIT on peak VO(2) in HFpEF or HFrEF were considered. Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and various markers of diastolic function were also analysed. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis, 4 of which compared MIT against CT and 13 compared MIT against HIIT. There were no significant differences between MIT and CT for peak VO(2) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.521 ml min(−1) kg(−1), [95% CI] =  − 0.7 to 1.8, P(fixed) = 0.412) or LVEF (WMD: − 1.129%, [95% CI] =  − 3.8 to 1.5, P(fixed) = 0.408). However, HIIT was significantly more effective than MIT at improving peak VO(2) (WMD: 1.62 ml min(−1) kg(−1), [95% CI] = 0.6–2.6, P(random) = 0.002) and LVEF (WMD: 3.24%, [95% CI] = 1.7–4.8, P(random) < 0.001) in HF patients. When dichotomized by HF phenotype, HIIT remained significantly more effective than MIT in all analyses except for peak VO(2) in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT is significantly more effective than MIT for improving peak VO(2) and LVEF in HF patients. With the exception of peak VO(2) in HFpEF, these findings remain consistent in both phenotypes. Separately, there is no difference in peak VO(2) and LVEF change following MIT or CT, suggesting that the addition of resistance exercise does not inhibit aerobic adaptations in HF. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00549-1. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9829948/ /pubmed/36622511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00549-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Edwards, Jamie
Shanmugam, Nesan
Ray, Robin
Jouhra, Fadi
Mancio, Jennifer
Wiles, Jonathan
Marciniak, Anna
Sharma, Rajan
O’Driscoll, Jamie
Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Exercise Mode in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort exercise mode in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00549-1
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsjamie exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shanmugamnesan exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rayrobin exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jouhrafadi exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manciojennifer exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wilesjonathan exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marciniakanna exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sharmarajan exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT odriscolljamie exercisemodeinheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis