Cargando…
Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations
BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row repair techniques have been described to treat rotator cuff tears. We present a novel surgical strategy of arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair in which a locking-loop suture bridge (LLSB) is used. PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes and repair in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142242 |
_version_ | 1784867597674610688 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yu-Chun Chen, Hung-Chou Wong, Chin-Chean Chang, Wen-Pei Lin, Chun-Hao Liaw, Chen-Kun Chen, Chih-Hwa Weng, Pei-Wei |
author_facet | Wang, Yu-Chun Chen, Hung-Chou Wong, Chin-Chean Chang, Wen-Pei Lin, Chun-Hao Liaw, Chen-Kun Chen, Chih-Hwa Weng, Pei-Wei |
author_sort | Wang, Yu-Chun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row repair techniques have been described to treat rotator cuff tears. We present a novel surgical strategy of arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair in which a locking-loop suture bridge (LLSB) is used. PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes and repair integrity of LLSB technique to the SR technique for arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair of small to medium rotator cuff tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included were 39 patients who underwent LLSB repair (LLSB group) and 44 patients who underwent SR suture anchor repair (SR group) from 2015 to 2018. We evaluated all patients preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Also, shoulder sonography was performed at 12 months postoperatively to evaluate repair integrity using the Sugaya classification system. The independent-sample t test was used to analyze functional outcomes (VAS, OSS, and ASES scores), and the Fisher exact test was used to analyze postoperative sonography results. RESULTS: Patients in both the LLSB and SR groups saw a significant improvement on all 3 outcome measures from preoperatively to 24 months postoperatively (P < .001 for all). However, when comparing scores between groups, only the scores at 3 months postoperatively differed significantly (VAS: P = .002; OSS: P < .001; ASES: P = .005). Shoulder sonography at 12 months postoperatively revealed no significant difference in repair integrity between the LLSB and SR groups (retear rate: 10.26% and 6.82%, respectively; P = .892). CONCLUSION: Better outcome scores were seen at 3-month follow-up in the LLSB group, with no difference in retear rates compared with the SR group at 12 months postoperatively. The LLSB technique was found to be a reliable technique for rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9830097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98300972023-01-11 Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations Wang, Yu-Chun Chen, Hung-Chou Wong, Chin-Chean Chang, Wen-Pei Lin, Chun-Hao Liaw, Chen-Kun Chen, Chih-Hwa Weng, Pei-Wei Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row repair techniques have been described to treat rotator cuff tears. We present a novel surgical strategy of arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair in which a locking-loop suture bridge (LLSB) is used. PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes and repair integrity of LLSB technique to the SR technique for arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair of small to medium rotator cuff tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included were 39 patients who underwent LLSB repair (LLSB group) and 44 patients who underwent SR suture anchor repair (SR group) from 2015 to 2018. We evaluated all patients preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Also, shoulder sonography was performed at 12 months postoperatively to evaluate repair integrity using the Sugaya classification system. The independent-sample t test was used to analyze functional outcomes (VAS, OSS, and ASES scores), and the Fisher exact test was used to analyze postoperative sonography results. RESULTS: Patients in both the LLSB and SR groups saw a significant improvement on all 3 outcome measures from preoperatively to 24 months postoperatively (P < .001 for all). However, when comparing scores between groups, only the scores at 3 months postoperatively differed significantly (VAS: P = .002; OSS: P < .001; ASES: P = .005). Shoulder sonography at 12 months postoperatively revealed no significant difference in repair integrity between the LLSB and SR groups (retear rate: 10.26% and 6.82%, respectively; P = .892). CONCLUSION: Better outcome scores were seen at 3-month follow-up in the LLSB group, with no difference in retear rates compared with the SR group at 12 months postoperatively. The LLSB technique was found to be a reliable technique for rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears. SAGE Publications 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9830097/ /pubmed/36636031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142242 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Yu-Chun Chen, Hung-Chou Wong, Chin-Chean Chang, Wen-Pei Lin, Chun-Hao Liaw, Chen-Kun Chen, Chih-Hwa Weng, Pei-Wei Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations |
title | Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture
Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study
With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations |
title_full | Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture
Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study
With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture
Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study
With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture
Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study
With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations |
title_short | Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture
Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study
With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations |
title_sort | comparison of locking-loop suture bridge repair and single-row suture
anchor repair in small to medium rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort study
with clinical and ultrasound evaluations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyuchun comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT chenhungchou comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT wongchinchean comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT changwenpei comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT linchunhao comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT liawchenkun comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT chenchihhwa comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations AT wengpeiwei comparisonoflockingloopsuturebridgerepairandsinglerowsutureanchorrepairinsmalltomediumrotatorcufftearsaprospectivecohortstudywithclinicalandultrasoundevaluations |