Cargando…
Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6 |
_version_ | 1784867605299855360 |
---|---|
author | De la Rosa-Cáceres, A. Lozano, O. M. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Fernandez-Calderon, F. Rossi, G. Diaz-Batanero, C. |
author_facet | De la Rosa-Cáceres, A. Lozano, O. M. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Fernandez-Calderon, F. Rossi, G. Diaz-Batanero, C. |
author_sort | De la Rosa-Cáceres, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (N = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (n = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (n = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's d effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (d = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (F (12.1377) = 155.305; p < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9830132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98301322023-01-10 Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores De la Rosa-Cáceres, A. Lozano, O. M. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Fernandez-Calderon, F. Rossi, G. Diaz-Batanero, C. J Psychopathol Behav Assess Article Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (N = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (n = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (n = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's d effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (d = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (F (12.1377) = 155.305; p < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence. Springer US 2023-01-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9830132/ /pubmed/36644288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article De la Rosa-Cáceres, A. Lozano, O. M. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Fernandez-Calderon, F. Rossi, G. Diaz-Batanero, C. Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores |
title | Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores |
title_full | Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores |
title_fullStr | Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores |
title_short | Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores |
title_sort | assessing internalizing symptoms and their relation with levels of impairment: evidence-based cutoffs for interpreting inventory of depression and anxiety symptoms (idas-ii) scores |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delarosacaceresa assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores AT lozanoom assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores AT sanchezgarciam assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores AT fernandezcalderonf assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores AT rossig assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores AT diazbataneroc assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores |