Cargando…

Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores

Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De la Rosa-Cáceres, A., Lozano, O. M., Sanchez-Garcia, M., Fernandez-Calderon, F., Rossi, G., Diaz-Batanero, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6
_version_ 1784867605299855360
author De la Rosa-Cáceres, A.
Lozano, O. M.
Sanchez-Garcia, M.
Fernandez-Calderon, F.
Rossi, G.
Diaz-Batanero, C.
author_facet De la Rosa-Cáceres, A.
Lozano, O. M.
Sanchez-Garcia, M.
Fernandez-Calderon, F.
Rossi, G.
Diaz-Batanero, C.
author_sort De la Rosa-Cáceres, A.
collection PubMed
description Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (N = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (n = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (n = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's d effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (d = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (F (12.1377) = 155.305; p < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9830132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98301322023-01-10 Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores De la Rosa-Cáceres, A. Lozano, O. M. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Fernandez-Calderon, F. Rossi, G. Diaz-Batanero, C. J Psychopathol Behav Assess Article Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (N = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (n = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (n = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's d effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (d = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (F (12.1377) = 155.305; p < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence. Springer US 2023-01-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9830132/ /pubmed/36644288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
De la Rosa-Cáceres, A.
Lozano, O. M.
Sanchez-Garcia, M.
Fernandez-Calderon, F.
Rossi, G.
Diaz-Batanero, C.
Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
title Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
title_full Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
title_fullStr Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
title_short Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores
title_sort assessing internalizing symptoms and their relation with levels of impairment: evidence-based cutoffs for interpreting inventory of depression and anxiety symptoms (idas-ii) scores
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6
work_keys_str_mv AT delarosacaceresa assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores
AT lozanoom assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores
AT sanchezgarciam assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores
AT fernandezcalderonf assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores
AT rossig assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores
AT diazbataneroc assessinginternalizingsymptomsandtheirrelationwithlevelsofimpairmentevidencebasedcutoffsforinterpretinginventoryofdepressionandanxietysymptomsidasiiscores