Cargando…

Risk factors and efficacy outcomes of early-onset severe neutropenia due to paclitaxel or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab (PTX/nab-PTX + RAM) is widely used as second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but severe neutropenia often develops with this regimen. Although previous studies have reported that severe neu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagiwara, Yuya, Nakasya, Akio, Matsumoto, Toshihiko, Ikoma, Tatsuki, Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki, Kurioka, Yusuke, Tsuduki, Takao, Kajiwara, Takeshi, Nishina, Tomohiro, Yamashita, Natsumi, Moriwaki, Toshikazu, Hyodo, Ichinosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636083
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-499
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab (PTX/nab-PTX + RAM) is widely used as second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but severe neutropenia often develops with this regimen. Although previous studies have reported that severe neutropenia is a favorable prognostic factor in cancer chemotherapy, it is unclear in AGC patients receiving PTX/nab-PTX + RAM. In addition, the risk factors for early-onset of severe neutropenia (EOSN) still remain unknown. METHODS: Among patients with AGC treated with PTX/nab-PTX (on day 1, 8, and 15) + RAM (on day 1 and 15) every 4 weeks as second-line therapy from January 2017 to June 2020, those with grade 0 or 1 neutropenia before the treatment were retrospectively studied. Blood tests were performed on the day of treatment each time, and disease progression was primarily determined by computed tomography every 8±2 weeks. EOSN was defined as grade 4 neutropenia that occurred during the first 28 days. The risk factors for EOSN were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with and without EOSN were investigated using multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The clinical data of 244 patients were analyzed. EOSN was observed in 51 (20.9%) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the following five risk factors for EOSN: age ≥65 years [odds ratio (OR), 2.75], presence of primary tumor (OR, 2.82), presence of peritoneal metastasis (OR, 2.52), grade 1 neutropenia (OR, 3.32), and high serum level of alkaline phosphatase (OR, 2.34). The PFS was significantly longer in patients with EOSN than in those without EOSN [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41–0.92] and the OS tended to be longer in patients with EOSN than in those without EOSN (adjusted HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.47–1.12). HR was adjusted with patient background factors and blood test data considered important as predictive or prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: EOSN may be associated with favorable outcomes in patients with AGC treated with PTX/nab-PTX + RAM. We should carefully try to treat them keeping the risk factors in mind.