Cargando…
Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
Appendicular skeletal mass is commonly used to assess the loss in muscle mass and Ultra Sound (US) approach represents a valid and reliable method. However, the procedural protocols are still heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the intertransducers validity of thickness, width, and C...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.11040 |
_version_ | 1784867661579026432 |
---|---|
author | Tognolo, Lucrezia Coraci, Daniele Farì, Giacomo Vallenari, Valeria Masiero, Stefano |
author_facet | Tognolo, Lucrezia Coraci, Daniele Farì, Giacomo Vallenari, Valeria Masiero, Stefano |
author_sort | Tognolo, Lucrezia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Appendicular skeletal mass is commonly used to assess the loss in muscle mass and Ultra Sound (US) approach represents a valid and reliable method. However, the procedural protocols are still heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the intertransducers validity of thickness, width, and CSA measurements of rectus femoris (RF) muscle. The anteroposterior (AP), (laterolateral) LL and (cross-sectional area) CSA of RF muscle were evaluated with both linear and curve probes in ten healthy subjects and six sarcopenic patients. In the healthy group the mean AP diameters measured with the linear array were significantly higher than those measured with the curved array. AP and CSA were higher in the healthy group compared with the sarcopenic group with both transducers. There was a positive correlation between weight and LL diameter, and a negative correlation between age and muscle AP, measured with the linear probe. Both linear and curved probes represent valid methods in US evaluation of the CSA of the RF muscle. However, in the healthy subjects, the thickness and width of the same muscle, are affected by the type of probe |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9830392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98303922023-01-11 Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers Tognolo, Lucrezia Coraci, Daniele Farì, Giacomo Vallenari, Valeria Masiero, Stefano Eur J Transl Myol Article Appendicular skeletal mass is commonly used to assess the loss in muscle mass and Ultra Sound (US) approach represents a valid and reliable method. However, the procedural protocols are still heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the intertransducers validity of thickness, width, and CSA measurements of rectus femoris (RF) muscle. The anteroposterior (AP), (laterolateral) LL and (cross-sectional area) CSA of RF muscle were evaluated with both linear and curve probes in ten healthy subjects and six sarcopenic patients. In the healthy group the mean AP diameters measured with the linear array were significantly higher than those measured with the curved array. AP and CSA were higher in the healthy group compared with the sarcopenic group with both transducers. There was a positive correlation between weight and LL diameter, and a negative correlation between age and muscle AP, measured with the linear probe. Both linear and curved probes represent valid methods in US evaluation of the CSA of the RF muscle. However, in the healthy subjects, the thickness and width of the same muscle, are affected by the type of probe PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9830392/ /pubmed/36533667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.11040 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Tognolo, Lucrezia Coraci, Daniele Farì, Giacomo Vallenari, Valeria Masiero, Stefano Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
title | Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
title_full | Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
title_fullStr | Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
title_short | Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
title_sort | validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: a comparative study between linear and curved array transducers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.11040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tognololucrezia validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers AT coracidaniele validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers AT farigiacomo validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers AT vallenarivaleria validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers AT masierostefano validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers |