Cargando…

Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers

Appendicular skeletal mass is commonly used to assess the loss in muscle mass and Ultra Sound (US) approach represents a valid and reliable method. However, the procedural protocols are still heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the intertransducers validity of thickness, width, and C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tognolo, Lucrezia, Coraci, Daniele, Farì, Giacomo, Vallenari, Valeria, Masiero, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533667
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.11040
_version_ 1784867661579026432
author Tognolo, Lucrezia
Coraci, Daniele
Farì, Giacomo
Vallenari, Valeria
Masiero, Stefano
author_facet Tognolo, Lucrezia
Coraci, Daniele
Farì, Giacomo
Vallenari, Valeria
Masiero, Stefano
author_sort Tognolo, Lucrezia
collection PubMed
description Appendicular skeletal mass is commonly used to assess the loss in muscle mass and Ultra Sound (US) approach represents a valid and reliable method. However, the procedural protocols are still heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the intertransducers validity of thickness, width, and CSA measurements of rectus femoris (RF) muscle. The anteroposterior (AP), (laterolateral) LL and (cross-sectional area) CSA of RF muscle were evaluated with both linear and curve probes in ten healthy subjects and six sarcopenic patients. In the healthy group the mean AP diameters measured with the linear array were significantly higher than those measured with the curved array. AP and CSA were higher in the healthy group compared with the sarcopenic group with both transducers. There was a positive correlation between weight and LL diameter, and a negative correlation between age and muscle AP, measured with the linear probe. Both linear and curved probes represent valid methods in US evaluation of the CSA of the RF muscle. However, in the healthy subjects, the thickness and width of the same muscle, are affected by the type of probe
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9830392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98303922023-01-11 Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers Tognolo, Lucrezia Coraci, Daniele Farì, Giacomo Vallenari, Valeria Masiero, Stefano Eur J Transl Myol Article Appendicular skeletal mass is commonly used to assess the loss in muscle mass and Ultra Sound (US) approach represents a valid and reliable method. However, the procedural protocols are still heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the intertransducers validity of thickness, width, and CSA measurements of rectus femoris (RF) muscle. The anteroposterior (AP), (laterolateral) LL and (cross-sectional area) CSA of RF muscle were evaluated with both linear and curve probes in ten healthy subjects and six sarcopenic patients. In the healthy group the mean AP diameters measured with the linear array were significantly higher than those measured with the curved array. AP and CSA were higher in the healthy group compared with the sarcopenic group with both transducers. There was a positive correlation between weight and LL diameter, and a negative correlation between age and muscle AP, measured with the linear probe. Both linear and curved probes represent valid methods in US evaluation of the CSA of the RF muscle. However, in the healthy subjects, the thickness and width of the same muscle, are affected by the type of probe PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9830392/ /pubmed/36533667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.11040 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Tognolo, Lucrezia
Coraci, Daniele
Farì, Giacomo
Vallenari, Valeria
Masiero, Stefano
Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
title Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
title_full Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
title_fullStr Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
title_full_unstemmed Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
title_short Validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: A comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
title_sort validity of ultrasound rectus femoris quantitative assessment: a comparative study between linear and curved array transducers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533667
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.11040
work_keys_str_mv AT tognololucrezia validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers
AT coracidaniele validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers
AT farigiacomo validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers
AT vallenarivaleria validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers
AT masierostefano validityofultrasoundrectusfemorisquantitativeassessmentacomparativestudybetweenlinearandcurvedarraytransducers