Feasibility of Using an Armband Optical Heart Rate Sensor in Naturalistic Environment

Consumer-grade heart rate (HR) sensors including chest straps, wrist-worn watches and rings have become very popular in recent years for tracking individual physiological state, training for sports and even measuring stress levels and emotional changes. While the majority of these consumer sensors are not medical devices, they can still offer insights for consumers and researchers if used correctly taking into account their limitations. Multiple previous studies have been done using a large variety of consumer sensors including Polar(®) devices, Apple(®) watches, and Fitbit(®) wrist bands. The vast majority of prior studies have been done in laboratory settings where collecting data is relatively straight-forward. However, using consumer sensors in naturalistic settings that present significant challenges, including noise artefacts and missing data, has not been as extensively investigated. Additionally, the majority of prior studies focused on wrist-worn optical HR sensors. Arm-worn sensors have not been extensively investigated either. In the present study, we validate HR measurements obtained with an arm-worn optical sensor (Polar OH1) against those obtained with a chest-strap electrical sensor (Polar H10) from 16 participants over a 2-week study period in naturalistic settings. We also investigated the impact of physical activity measured with 3-D accelerometers embedded in the H10 chest strap and OH1 armband sensors on the agreement between the two sensors. Overall, we find that the arm-worn optical Polar OH1 sensor provides a good estimate of HR (Pearson r = 0.90, p <0.01). Filtering the signal that corresponds to physical activity further improves the HR estimates but only slightly (Pearson r = 0.91, p <0.01). Based on these preliminary findings, we conclude that the arm-worn Polar OH1 sensor provides usable HR measurements in daily living conditions, with some caveats discussed in the paper.