Cargando…

Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study

BACKGROUND: Reusable laryngoscopes have been reported to be superior to disposable laryngoscopes with plastic blades during emergent intubations. Surprisingly, at our institution a quality reporting system revealed a high number of equipment failures with reusable laryngoscopes in an emergency out-o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simmons, Colby G., Eckle, Tobias, Rogers, Dustin, Williams, Jason D., Brainard, Jason C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01956-3
_version_ 1784867756486688768
author Simmons, Colby G.
Eckle, Tobias
Rogers, Dustin
Williams, Jason D.
Brainard, Jason C.
author_facet Simmons, Colby G.
Eckle, Tobias
Rogers, Dustin
Williams, Jason D.
Brainard, Jason C.
author_sort Simmons, Colby G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reusable laryngoscopes have been reported to be superior to disposable laryngoscopes with plastic blades during emergent intubations. Surprisingly, at our institution a quality reporting system revealed a high number of equipment failures with reusable laryngoscopes in an emergency out-of-OR (operating room) setting. As recent studies indicated an improved quality of disposable laryngoscopes, we hypothesized that a thoroughly evaluated disposable laryngoscope would result in less equipment failure in an emergency out-of-OR setting. METHODS: To perform a more standardized and time efficient analysis, four distinct disposable laryngoscope blade/handle configurations were trialed during standard intubations (n = 4 × 30) in the OR by experienced anesthesia providers who completed a 6-question, Likert-scale/open-ended survey for product evaluation. The ‘best’ disposable blade was implemented in an emergency out-of-OR setting and equipment failure rates were monitored over a 3-year period. RESULTS: Different disposable laryngoscopes were equal regarding sturdiness, illumination and airway visualization. The laryngoscope with the highest overall score was significantly higher scored than the laryngoscope with the lowest overall score. All disposable laryngoscopes were more cost effective than the reusable ones, and the top scored laryngoscope demonstrated the highest 5-year cost-saving ($210 K). Implementation of the top scored disposable laryngoscope into an emergency out-of-OR setting reduced the equipment failure incidence from high 20s to 0. CONCLUSION: Disposable laryngoscopes are cost effective and superior to reusable laryngoscopes in an emergency out-of-OR setting. We demonstrate that the implementation of a disposable laryngoscope in the emergency out-of-OR setting resulted in a near elimination of equipment related quality submissions which ultimately enhances patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9830876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98308762023-01-11 Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study Simmons, Colby G. Eckle, Tobias Rogers, Dustin Williams, Jason D. Brainard, Jason C. BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Reusable laryngoscopes have been reported to be superior to disposable laryngoscopes with plastic blades during emergent intubations. Surprisingly, at our institution a quality reporting system revealed a high number of equipment failures with reusable laryngoscopes in an emergency out-of-OR (operating room) setting. As recent studies indicated an improved quality of disposable laryngoscopes, we hypothesized that a thoroughly evaluated disposable laryngoscope would result in less equipment failure in an emergency out-of-OR setting. METHODS: To perform a more standardized and time efficient analysis, four distinct disposable laryngoscope blade/handle configurations were trialed during standard intubations (n = 4 × 30) in the OR by experienced anesthesia providers who completed a 6-question, Likert-scale/open-ended survey for product evaluation. The ‘best’ disposable blade was implemented in an emergency out-of-OR setting and equipment failure rates were monitored over a 3-year period. RESULTS: Different disposable laryngoscopes were equal regarding sturdiness, illumination and airway visualization. The laryngoscope with the highest overall score was significantly higher scored than the laryngoscope with the lowest overall score. All disposable laryngoscopes were more cost effective than the reusable ones, and the top scored laryngoscope demonstrated the highest 5-year cost-saving ($210 K). Implementation of the top scored disposable laryngoscope into an emergency out-of-OR setting reduced the equipment failure incidence from high 20s to 0. CONCLUSION: Disposable laryngoscopes are cost effective and superior to reusable laryngoscopes in an emergency out-of-OR setting. We demonstrate that the implementation of a disposable laryngoscope in the emergency out-of-OR setting resulted in a near elimination of equipment related quality submissions which ultimately enhances patient safety. BioMed Central 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9830876/ /pubmed/36627551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01956-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Simmons, Colby G.
Eckle, Tobias
Rogers, Dustin
Williams, Jason D.
Brainard, Jason C.
Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study
title Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study
title_full Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study
title_fullStr Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study
title_full_unstemmed Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study
title_short Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study
title_sort disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of or setting - a quality control case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01956-3
work_keys_str_mv AT simmonscolbyg disposablelaryngoscopeintubationtoreduceequipmentfailureinanemergencyoutoforsettingaqualitycontrolcasestudy
AT eckletobias disposablelaryngoscopeintubationtoreduceequipmentfailureinanemergencyoutoforsettingaqualitycontrolcasestudy
AT rogersdustin disposablelaryngoscopeintubationtoreduceequipmentfailureinanemergencyoutoforsettingaqualitycontrolcasestudy
AT williamsjasond disposablelaryngoscopeintubationtoreduceequipmentfailureinanemergencyoutoforsettingaqualitycontrolcasestudy
AT brainardjasonc disposablelaryngoscopeintubationtoreduceequipmentfailureinanemergencyoutoforsettingaqualitycontrolcasestudy