Cargando…

Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues

Intervention research in population health focuses on actions carried out by researchers in partnership with those involved in the intervention: health professionals, patients, carers, public policy makers and population communities. The diversity of actors shapes PHIR projects, testifies to the ric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Guillemin, A-F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830973/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.074
_version_ 1784867773712695296
author Guillemin, A-F
author_facet Guillemin, A-F
author_sort Guillemin, A-F
collection PubMed
description Intervention research in population health focuses on actions carried out by researchers in partnership with those involved in the intervention: health professionals, patients, carers, public policy makers and population communities. The diversity of actors shapes PHIR projects, testifies to the richness of this research and gives it a privileged place to analyse and intervene as accurately as possible in different contexts and populations. It also implies the need for a better understanding of how to intervene by considering the determinants of health in these interventions. PHIR in health promotion in the domain of cancer thus proposes a paradigm shift from describing the problem and its causes to intervention. RISP bases its theoretical anchors on the one hand on the contributions and models of public health, health promotion and human and social sciences and on the other hand, on its own contributions to theorise and build its own theoretical and methodological corpus. This presentation will aim to clarify this paradigm shift and five methodological challenges of PHIR: the imperialism of epidemiology as a research model; the evaluation models of PHIR and their polymorphism; the complexity of the objects of study; the partnership dynamics between researchers and field actors without which research cannot be carried out. Finally, the challenges of publication and valorisation of this type of research. Through concrete examples, participants will be invited to understand the challenges of the RISP methodology, and to analyse different concrete perspectives to address them. The first part will focus on identifying the participants’ representations of the methodological difficulties of PHIR. The second part will be an interactive presentation of 12 minutes, the last 2-3 minutes will be devoted to final questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9830973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98309732023-01-10 Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues Guillemin, A-F Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme Intervention research in population health focuses on actions carried out by researchers in partnership with those involved in the intervention: health professionals, patients, carers, public policy makers and population communities. The diversity of actors shapes PHIR projects, testifies to the richness of this research and gives it a privileged place to analyse and intervene as accurately as possible in different contexts and populations. It also implies the need for a better understanding of how to intervene by considering the determinants of health in these interventions. PHIR in health promotion in the domain of cancer thus proposes a paradigm shift from describing the problem and its causes to intervention. RISP bases its theoretical anchors on the one hand on the contributions and models of public health, health promotion and human and social sciences and on the other hand, on its own contributions to theorise and build its own theoretical and methodological corpus. This presentation will aim to clarify this paradigm shift and five methodological challenges of PHIR: the imperialism of epidemiology as a research model; the evaluation models of PHIR and their polymorphism; the complexity of the objects of study; the partnership dynamics between researchers and field actors without which research cannot be carried out. Finally, the challenges of publication and valorisation of this type of research. Through concrete examples, participants will be invited to understand the challenges of the RISP methodology, and to analyse different concrete perspectives to address them. The first part will focus on identifying the participants’ representations of the methodological difficulties of PHIR. The second part will be an interactive presentation of 12 minutes, the last 2-3 minutes will be devoted to final questions. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9830973/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.074 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Guillemin, A-F
Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
title Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
title_full Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
title_fullStr Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
title_full_unstemmed Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
title_short Intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
title_sort intervention research in health promotion: methodological issues
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830973/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.074
work_keys_str_mv AT guilleminaf interventionresearchinhealthpromotionmethodologicalissues