Cargando…

Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition

Faecal or biopsy samples are frequently used to analyse the gut microbiota, but issues remain with the provision and collection of such samples. Rectal swabs are widely-utilised in clinical practice and previous data demonstrate their potential role in microbiota analyses; however, studies to date h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radhakrishnan, Shiva T., Gallagher, Kate I., Mullish, Benjamin H., Serrano-Contreras, Jose I., Alexander, James L., Miguens Blanco, Jesus, Danckert, Nathan P., Valdivia-Garcia, Maria, Hopkins, Billy J., Ghai, Anik, Ayub, Azad, Li, Jia V., Marchesi, Julian R., Williams, Horace R. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9
_version_ 1784867782138003456
author Radhakrishnan, Shiva T.
Gallagher, Kate I.
Mullish, Benjamin H.
Serrano-Contreras, Jose I.
Alexander, James L.
Miguens Blanco, Jesus
Danckert, Nathan P.
Valdivia-Garcia, Maria
Hopkins, Billy J.
Ghai, Anik
Ayub, Azad
Li, Jia V.
Marchesi, Julian R.
Williams, Horace R. T.
author_facet Radhakrishnan, Shiva T.
Gallagher, Kate I.
Mullish, Benjamin H.
Serrano-Contreras, Jose I.
Alexander, James L.
Miguens Blanco, Jesus
Danckert, Nathan P.
Valdivia-Garcia, Maria
Hopkins, Billy J.
Ghai, Anik
Ayub, Azad
Li, Jia V.
Marchesi, Julian R.
Williams, Horace R. T.
author_sort Radhakrishnan, Shiva T.
collection PubMed
description Faecal or biopsy samples are frequently used to analyse the gut microbiota, but issues remain with the provision and collection of such samples. Rectal swabs are widely-utilised in clinical practice and previous data demonstrate their potential role in microbiota analyses; however, studies to date have been heterogenous, and there are a particular lack of data concerning the utility of swabs for the analysis of the microbiota’s functionality and metabolome. We compared paired stool and rectal swab samples from healthy individuals to investigate whether rectal swabs are a reliable proxy for faecal sampling. There were no significant differences in key alpha and beta diversity measures between swab and faecal samples, and inter-subject variability was preserved. Additionally, no significant differences were demonstrated in abundance of major annotated phyla. Inferred gut functionality using Tax4Fun2 showed excellent correlation between the two sampling techniques (Pearson’s coefficient r = 0.9217, P < 0.0001). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) spectroscopy enabled the detection of 20 metabolites, with overall excellent correlation identified between rectal swab and faecal samples for levels all metabolites collectively, although more variable degrees of association between swab and stool for levels of individual metabolites. These data support the utility of rectal swabs in both compositional and functional analyses of the gut microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9831010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98310102023-01-10 Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition Radhakrishnan, Shiva T. Gallagher, Kate I. Mullish, Benjamin H. Serrano-Contreras, Jose I. Alexander, James L. Miguens Blanco, Jesus Danckert, Nathan P. Valdivia-Garcia, Maria Hopkins, Billy J. Ghai, Anik Ayub, Azad Li, Jia V. Marchesi, Julian R. Williams, Horace R. T. Sci Rep Article Faecal or biopsy samples are frequently used to analyse the gut microbiota, but issues remain with the provision and collection of such samples. Rectal swabs are widely-utilised in clinical practice and previous data demonstrate their potential role in microbiota analyses; however, studies to date have been heterogenous, and there are a particular lack of data concerning the utility of swabs for the analysis of the microbiota’s functionality and metabolome. We compared paired stool and rectal swab samples from healthy individuals to investigate whether rectal swabs are a reliable proxy for faecal sampling. There were no significant differences in key alpha and beta diversity measures between swab and faecal samples, and inter-subject variability was preserved. Additionally, no significant differences were demonstrated in abundance of major annotated phyla. Inferred gut functionality using Tax4Fun2 showed excellent correlation between the two sampling techniques (Pearson’s coefficient r = 0.9217, P < 0.0001). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) spectroscopy enabled the detection of 20 metabolites, with overall excellent correlation identified between rectal swab and faecal samples for levels all metabolites collectively, although more variable degrees of association between swab and stool for levels of individual metabolites. These data support the utility of rectal swabs in both compositional and functional analyses of the gut microbiota. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9831010/ /pubmed/36627399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Radhakrishnan, Shiva T.
Gallagher, Kate I.
Mullish, Benjamin H.
Serrano-Contreras, Jose I.
Alexander, James L.
Miguens Blanco, Jesus
Danckert, Nathan P.
Valdivia-Garcia, Maria
Hopkins, Billy J.
Ghai, Anik
Ayub, Azad
Li, Jia V.
Marchesi, Julian R.
Williams, Horace R. T.
Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
title Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
title_full Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
title_fullStr Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
title_full_unstemmed Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
title_short Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
title_sort rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9
work_keys_str_mv AT radhakrishnanshivat rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT gallagherkatei rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT mullishbenjaminh rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT serranocontrerasjosei rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT alexanderjamesl rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT miguensblancojesus rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT danckertnathanp rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT valdiviagarciamaria rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT hopkinsbillyj rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT ghaianik rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT ayubazad rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT lijiav rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT marchesijulianr rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition
AT williamshoracert rectalswabsasaviablealternativetofaecalsamplingfortheanalysisofgutmicrobiotafunctionalityandcomposition