Cargando…

Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Precarious employment (PE), characterized by reduced worker rights, and employment and income insecurity, has complex public health implications including negative impacts on workers’ mental and physical health, occupational health and safety, wellbeing, and inequities in access to healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunn, V, Vignola, EF, Wegman, DH, Hogstedt, C, Bodin, T, Orellana, C, O'Campo, P, Albin, M, Håkansta, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.096
_version_ 1784867786536779776
author Gunn, V
Vignola, EF
Wegman, DH
Hogstedt, C
Bodin, T
Orellana, C
O'Campo, P
Albin, M
Håkansta, C
author_facet Gunn, V
Vignola, EF
Wegman, DH
Hogstedt, C
Bodin, T
Orellana, C
O'Campo, P
Albin, M
Håkansta, C
author_sort Gunn, V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Precarious employment (PE), characterized by reduced worker rights, and employment and income insecurity, has complex public health implications including negative impacts on workers’ mental and physical health, occupational health and safety, wellbeing, and inequities in access to health and social protections. There is, however, a knowledge gap regarding effectiveness of interventions. We describe findings from a review of evaluated interventions with potential to address PE. METHODS: Our systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA framework and covered PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and sources of grey literature. We included qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies evaluating initiatives to reduce workers’ PE published from 2000 to 2021 and focused on adult workers. RESULTS: The 23 eligible studies from across the world evaluated diverse strategies addressing PE including tax and trade reforms, industrial disputes legislation, business registration, and use of incentives to stimulate permanent contracts. Also included were union strategies to reach precarious workers, the provision of social benefits, and youth apprenticeships. Generally, while most initiatives had the potential to tackle certain PE aspects, they usually acted only on one or two PE dimensions. Additionally, the evaluation components were missing key details, thus, limiting the generalizability of findings, as did the heterogeneity of study designs, initiative purposes, economic and political context, and diverse populations targeted. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in PE prevalence and its complex health implications requires sustainable upstream public health solutions. Multidisciplinary collaborations among public health and occupational health practitioners along with researchers, evaluation specialists, economists, and politicians could facilitate the implementation and evaluation of policies and standards regulating and monitoring PE and its health impacts. KEY MESSAGES: • Precarious employment has complex public health implications. • Sustainable solutions to address precarious employment must be upstream and multidisciplinary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9831032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98310322023-01-10 Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review Gunn, V Vignola, EF Wegman, DH Hogstedt, C Bodin, T Orellana, C O'Campo, P Albin, M Håkansta, C Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Precarious employment (PE), characterized by reduced worker rights, and employment and income insecurity, has complex public health implications including negative impacts on workers’ mental and physical health, occupational health and safety, wellbeing, and inequities in access to health and social protections. There is, however, a knowledge gap regarding effectiveness of interventions. We describe findings from a review of evaluated interventions with potential to address PE. METHODS: Our systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA framework and covered PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and sources of grey literature. We included qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies evaluating initiatives to reduce workers’ PE published from 2000 to 2021 and focused on adult workers. RESULTS: The 23 eligible studies from across the world evaluated diverse strategies addressing PE including tax and trade reforms, industrial disputes legislation, business registration, and use of incentives to stimulate permanent contracts. Also included were union strategies to reach precarious workers, the provision of social benefits, and youth apprenticeships. Generally, while most initiatives had the potential to tackle certain PE aspects, they usually acted only on one or two PE dimensions. Additionally, the evaluation components were missing key details, thus, limiting the generalizability of findings, as did the heterogeneity of study designs, initiative purposes, economic and political context, and diverse populations targeted. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in PE prevalence and its complex health implications requires sustainable upstream public health solutions. Multidisciplinary collaborations among public health and occupational health practitioners along with researchers, evaluation specialists, economists, and politicians could facilitate the implementation and evaluation of policies and standards regulating and monitoring PE and its health impacts. KEY MESSAGES: • Precarious employment has complex public health implications. • Sustainable solutions to address precarious employment must be upstream and multidisciplinary. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9831032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.096 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Gunn, V
Vignola, EF
Wegman, DH
Hogstedt, C
Bodin, T
Orellana, C
O'Campo, P
Albin, M
Håkansta, C
Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
title Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
title_full Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
title_fullStr Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
title_short Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
title_sort labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: a systematic review
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.096
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnv labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT vignolaef labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT wegmandh labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT hogstedtc labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT bodint labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT orellanac labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT ocampop labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT albinm labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT hakanstac labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview
AT labourmarketstrategiesaddressingprecariousemploymentanditsimpactsasystematicreview