Cargando…
The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794 |
_version_ | 1784867788488179712 |
---|---|
author | Rahman, Saqib A. Walker, Robert C. Maynard, Nick Nigel Trudgill, Crosby, Tom Cromwell, David A. Underwood, Timothy J. |
author_facet | Rahman, Saqib A. Walker, Robert C. Maynard, Nick Nigel Trudgill, Crosby, Tom Cromwell, David A. Underwood, Timothy J. |
author_sort | Rahman, Saqib A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a Random Survival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%–84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%—83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9831040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98310402023-01-12 The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests Rahman, Saqib A. Walker, Robert C. Maynard, Nick Nigel Trudgill, Crosby, Tom Cromwell, David A. Underwood, Timothy J. Ann Surg Original Articles The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a Random Survival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%–84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%—83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9831040/ /pubmed/33630434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rahman, Saqib A. Walker, Robert C. Maynard, Nick Nigel Trudgill, Crosby, Tom Cromwell, David A. Underwood, Timothy J. The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
title | The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
title_full | The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
title_fullStr | The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
title_full_unstemmed | The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
title_short | The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
title_sort | augis survival predictor: prediction of long-term and conditional survival after esophagectomy using random survival forests |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahmansaqiba theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT walkerrobertc theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT maynardnick theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT nigeltrudgill theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT crosbytom theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT cromwelldavida theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT underwoodtimothyj theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT rahmansaqiba augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT walkerrobertc augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT maynardnick augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT nigeltrudgill augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT crosbytom augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT cromwelldavida augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests AT underwoodtimothyj augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests |