Cargando…

The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahman, Saqib A., Walker, Robert C., Maynard, Nick, Nigel Trudgill, Crosby, Tom, Cromwell, David A., Underwood, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794
_version_ 1784867788488179712
author Rahman, Saqib A.
Walker, Robert C.
Maynard, Nick
Nigel Trudgill,
Crosby, Tom
Cromwell, David A.
Underwood, Timothy J.
author_facet Rahman, Saqib A.
Walker, Robert C.
Maynard, Nick
Nigel Trudgill,
Crosby, Tom
Cromwell, David A.
Underwood, Timothy J.
author_sort Rahman, Saqib A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a Random Survival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%–84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%—83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9831040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98310402023-01-12 The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests Rahman, Saqib A. Walker, Robert C. Maynard, Nick Nigel Trudgill, Crosby, Tom Cromwell, David A. Underwood, Timothy J. Ann Surg Original Articles The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a Random Survival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%–84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%—83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9831040/ /pubmed/33630434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rahman, Saqib A.
Walker, Robert C.
Maynard, Nick
Nigel Trudgill,
Crosby, Tom
Cromwell, David A.
Underwood, Timothy J.
The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
title The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
title_full The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
title_fullStr The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
title_full_unstemmed The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
title_short The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
title_sort augis survival predictor: prediction of long-term and conditional survival after esophagectomy using random survival forests
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmansaqiba theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT walkerrobertc theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT maynardnick theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT nigeltrudgill theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT crosbytom theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT cromwelldavida theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT underwoodtimothyj theaugissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT rahmansaqiba augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT walkerrobertc augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT maynardnick augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT nigeltrudgill augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT crosbytom augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT cromwelldavida augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests
AT underwoodtimothyj augissurvivalpredictorpredictionoflongtermandconditionalsurvivalafteresophagectomyusingrandomsurvivalforests