Cargando…

Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the time impact of ARGOS(®) (image-guided swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer integrated with operating room (OR) technologies (SS-OCT w/ORT)) compared to LENSTAR LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR)), IOLMaster 500 (partial coherence i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Multack, Samuel, Pan, Li-Chen, Timmons, Sean K, Datar, Manasi, Hsiao, Chia-Wen, Babu, Raiju, Pan, Sun-Ming, Woodard, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636623
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S384545
_version_ 1784867794977816576
author Multack, Samuel
Pan, Li-Chen
Timmons, Sean K
Datar, Manasi
Hsiao, Chia-Wen
Babu, Raiju
Pan, Sun-Ming
Woodard, Lawrence
author_facet Multack, Samuel
Pan, Li-Chen
Timmons, Sean K
Datar, Manasi
Hsiao, Chia-Wen
Babu, Raiju
Pan, Sun-Ming
Woodard, Lawrence
author_sort Multack, Samuel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the time impact of ARGOS(®) (image-guided swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer integrated with operating room (OR) technologies (SS-OCT w/ORT)) compared to LENSTAR LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR)), IOLMaster 500 (partial coherence interferometry (PCI)), and IOLMaster 700 (SS-OCT) on efficiency in the cataract evaluation and surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 212 patients (two study sites) who underwent evaluation and/or cataract surgery were collected. The primary objective was to compare the performance of four biometers; statistical analyses were conducted to compare 1) biometer measurement times for all patients (ANOVA w/post-hoc Dunnett’s test) and stratified by cataract density (ANOVA) and 2) rate of biometer acquisition failure (Chi-square test w/post-hoc Bonferroni correction). Real-world observational data collected were then used to develop a practice-based time-efficiency model to demonstrate the combined effect that adopting an SS-OCT w/ORT has on a practice’s cataract workflow. Real-world data inputs included assessment of patient’s eyes’ cataract grade density, time taken for optical biometry, Manual A-scan (ultrasound biometer) when acquisition failed, and measurement times associated with other devices used in cataract evaluation and surgery. RESULTS: For 208 patients (56% non-dense, 44% dense), the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer had a 0% acquisition failure (SS-OCT: 3% (p = 0.05); OLCR: 5% (p = 0.004); PCI: 15% (p < 0.0001)) and an average time savings of 30 seconds/patient compared to the other biometers in this study (p < 0.05). When acquisition failed, ultrasound biometry resulted in an additional 2.5 minutes/patient. For a cohort of 1000 patients, an SS-OCT w/ORT and an image-guidance system adopted at a practice using an SS-OCT, femtosecond laser, and intraoperative aberrometer offer up to 58% efficiency gain across the cataract workflow. CONCLUSION: Results from this study demonstrate an SS-OCT w/ORT’s efficiencies in cataract evaluation and surgery driven by faster measurement times, reducing the need for ultrasound biometry, and its integration benefits with other devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9831073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98310732023-01-11 Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study Multack, Samuel Pan, Li-Chen Timmons, Sean K Datar, Manasi Hsiao, Chia-Wen Babu, Raiju Pan, Sun-Ming Woodard, Lawrence Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the time impact of ARGOS(®) (image-guided swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer integrated with operating room (OR) technologies (SS-OCT w/ORT)) compared to LENSTAR LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR)), IOLMaster 500 (partial coherence interferometry (PCI)), and IOLMaster 700 (SS-OCT) on efficiency in the cataract evaluation and surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 212 patients (two study sites) who underwent evaluation and/or cataract surgery were collected. The primary objective was to compare the performance of four biometers; statistical analyses were conducted to compare 1) biometer measurement times for all patients (ANOVA w/post-hoc Dunnett’s test) and stratified by cataract density (ANOVA) and 2) rate of biometer acquisition failure (Chi-square test w/post-hoc Bonferroni correction). Real-world observational data collected were then used to develop a practice-based time-efficiency model to demonstrate the combined effect that adopting an SS-OCT w/ORT has on a practice’s cataract workflow. Real-world data inputs included assessment of patient’s eyes’ cataract grade density, time taken for optical biometry, Manual A-scan (ultrasound biometer) when acquisition failed, and measurement times associated with other devices used in cataract evaluation and surgery. RESULTS: For 208 patients (56% non-dense, 44% dense), the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer had a 0% acquisition failure (SS-OCT: 3% (p = 0.05); OLCR: 5% (p = 0.004); PCI: 15% (p < 0.0001)) and an average time savings of 30 seconds/patient compared to the other biometers in this study (p < 0.05). When acquisition failed, ultrasound biometry resulted in an additional 2.5 minutes/patient. For a cohort of 1000 patients, an SS-OCT w/ORT and an image-guidance system adopted at a practice using an SS-OCT, femtosecond laser, and intraoperative aberrometer offer up to 58% efficiency gain across the cataract workflow. CONCLUSION: Results from this study demonstrate an SS-OCT w/ORT’s efficiencies in cataract evaluation and surgery driven by faster measurement times, reducing the need for ultrasound biometry, and its integration benefits with other devices. Dove 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9831073/ /pubmed/36636623 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S384545 Text en © 2023 Multack et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Multack, Samuel
Pan, Li-Chen
Timmons, Sean K
Datar, Manasi
Hsiao, Chia-Wen
Babu, Raiju
Pan, Sun-Ming
Woodard, Lawrence
Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study
title Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study
title_full Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study
title_fullStr Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study
title_short Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study
title_sort impact of a swept source-optical coherence tomography device on efficiency in cataract evaluation and surgery: a time-and-motion study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636623
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S384545
work_keys_str_mv AT multacksamuel impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT panlichen impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT timmonsseank impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT datarmanasi impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT hsiaochiawen impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT baburaiju impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT pansunming impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy
AT woodardlawrence impactofasweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydeviceonefficiencyincataractevaluationandsurgeryatimeandmotionstudy