Cargando…
Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study
Corporations across sectors engage in the conduct, sponsorship, and dissemination of scientific research. Industry sponsorship of research, however, is associated with research agendas, outcomes, and conclusions that are favourable to the sponsor. The legalization of cannabis in Canada provides a us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280110 |
_version_ | 1784867824939827200 |
---|---|
author | Grundy, Quinn Imahori, Daphne Mahajan, Shreya Garner, Gord Timothy, Roberta Sud, Abhimanyu Soklaridis, Sophie Buchman, Daniel Z. |
author_facet | Grundy, Quinn Imahori, Daphne Mahajan, Shreya Garner, Gord Timothy, Roberta Sud, Abhimanyu Soklaridis, Sophie Buchman, Daniel Z. |
author_sort | Grundy, Quinn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Corporations across sectors engage in the conduct, sponsorship, and dissemination of scientific research. Industry sponsorship of research, however, is associated with research agendas, outcomes, and conclusions that are favourable to the sponsor. The legalization of cannabis in Canada provides a useful case study to understand the nature and extent of the nascent cannabis industry’s involvement in the production of scientific evidence as well as broader impacts on equity-oriented research agendas. We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, meta-research study to describe the characteristics of research that reports funding from, or author conflicts of interest with, Canadian cannabis companies. From May to August 2021, we sampled licensed, prominent Canadian cannabis companies, identified their subsidiaries, and searched each company name in the PubMed conflict of interest statement search interface. Authors of included articles disclosed research support from, or conflicts of interest with, Canadian cannabis companies. We included 156 articles: 82% included at least one author with a conflict of interest and 1/3 reported study support from a Canadian cannabis company. More than half of the sampled articles were not cannabis focused, however, a cannabis company was listed amongst other biomedical companies in the author disclosure statement. For articles with a cannabis focus, prevalent topics included cannabis as a treatment for a range of conditions (15/72, 21%), particularly chronic pain (6/72, 8%); as a tool in harm reduction related to other substance use (10/72, 14%); product safety (10/72, 14%); and preclinical animal studies (6/72, 8%). Demographics were underreported in empirical studies with human participants, but most included adults (76/84, 90%) and, where reported, predominantly white (32/39, 82%) and male (49/83, 59%) participants. The cannabis company-funded studies included people who used drugs (37%) and people prescribed medical cannabis (22%). Canadian cannabis companies may be analogous to peer industries such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, tobacco, and food in the following three ways: sponsoring research related to product development, expanding indications of use, and supporting key opinion leaders. Given the recent legalization of cannabis in Canada, there is ample opportunity to create a policy climate that can mitigate the harms of criminalization as well as impacts of the “funding effect” on research integrity, research agendas, and the evidence base available for decision-making, while promoting high-priority and equity-oriented independent research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9831296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98312962023-01-11 Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study Grundy, Quinn Imahori, Daphne Mahajan, Shreya Garner, Gord Timothy, Roberta Sud, Abhimanyu Soklaridis, Sophie Buchman, Daniel Z. PLoS One Research Article Corporations across sectors engage in the conduct, sponsorship, and dissemination of scientific research. Industry sponsorship of research, however, is associated with research agendas, outcomes, and conclusions that are favourable to the sponsor. The legalization of cannabis in Canada provides a useful case study to understand the nature and extent of the nascent cannabis industry’s involvement in the production of scientific evidence as well as broader impacts on equity-oriented research agendas. We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, meta-research study to describe the characteristics of research that reports funding from, or author conflicts of interest with, Canadian cannabis companies. From May to August 2021, we sampled licensed, prominent Canadian cannabis companies, identified their subsidiaries, and searched each company name in the PubMed conflict of interest statement search interface. Authors of included articles disclosed research support from, or conflicts of interest with, Canadian cannabis companies. We included 156 articles: 82% included at least one author with a conflict of interest and 1/3 reported study support from a Canadian cannabis company. More than half of the sampled articles were not cannabis focused, however, a cannabis company was listed amongst other biomedical companies in the author disclosure statement. For articles with a cannabis focus, prevalent topics included cannabis as a treatment for a range of conditions (15/72, 21%), particularly chronic pain (6/72, 8%); as a tool in harm reduction related to other substance use (10/72, 14%); product safety (10/72, 14%); and preclinical animal studies (6/72, 8%). Demographics were underreported in empirical studies with human participants, but most included adults (76/84, 90%) and, where reported, predominantly white (32/39, 82%) and male (49/83, 59%) participants. The cannabis company-funded studies included people who used drugs (37%) and people prescribed medical cannabis (22%). Canadian cannabis companies may be analogous to peer industries such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, tobacco, and food in the following three ways: sponsoring research related to product development, expanding indications of use, and supporting key opinion leaders. Given the recent legalization of cannabis in Canada, there is ample opportunity to create a policy climate that can mitigate the harms of criminalization as well as impacts of the “funding effect” on research integrity, research agendas, and the evidence base available for decision-making, while promoting high-priority and equity-oriented independent research. Public Library of Science 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9831296/ /pubmed/36626363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280110 Text en © 2023 Grundy et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grundy, Quinn Imahori, Daphne Mahajan, Shreya Garner, Gord Timothy, Roberta Sud, Abhimanyu Soklaridis, Sophie Buchman, Daniel Z. Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study |
title | Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study |
title_full | Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study |
title_fullStr | Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study |
title_short | Cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: A cross-sectional Canadian case study |
title_sort | cannabis companies and the sponsorship of scientific research: a cross-sectional canadian case study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grundyquinn cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT imahoridaphne cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT mahajanshreya cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT garnergord cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT timothyroberta cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT sudabhimanyu cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT soklaridissophie cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy AT buchmandanielz cannabiscompaniesandthesponsorshipofscientificresearchacrosssectionalcanadiancasestudy |