Cargando…

Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study

BACKGROUND: After forced migration, pregnant women and new mothers face specific challenges in the host country. Little research focuses on the impact these challenges have on forced migrant (FM) women’s mental health (MH). The study’s aim shed light on FM women’s mental wellbeing in the perinatal p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Munjid, R, Teschemacher, L, Mohr, E, Engelhardt, M, Breckenkamp, J, Borde, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831331/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.445
_version_ 1784867832357453824
author Al Munjid, R
Teschemacher, L
Mohr, E
Engelhardt, M
Breckenkamp, J
Borde, T
author_facet Al Munjid, R
Teschemacher, L
Mohr, E
Engelhardt, M
Breckenkamp, J
Borde, T
author_sort Al Munjid, R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After forced migration, pregnant women and new mothers face specific challenges in the host country. Little research focuses on the impact these challenges have on forced migrant (FM) women’s mental health (MH). The study’s aim shed light on FM women’s mental wellbeing in the perinatal period. METHODS: For this mixed-method study 15 individual problem-centered interviews were carried out in Arabic with FM mothers living in Germany within the postnatal period to one year postpartum. The transcripts were analysed using the Framework Analysis. In addition, structured quantitative interviews with 3070 new mothers were conducted on 3 obstetric wards in Berlin over a period of 23 months using an adapted version of the MFMCQ and the PHQ4. FM women (n = 187) were compared with immigrant (n = 1192) and non-immigrant women (n = 1673). A Kruskal-Wallis-Test was performed to compare the three groups. RESULTS: In the qualitative interviews mothers stated having depression and varied emotions (e.g. unavoidable sadness, relief). Most FM mothers indicated contextual factors (e.g. bad housing conditions) and structural barriers in perinatal healthcare as negatively impacting their MH. The preliminary quantitative analysis of the interviews conducted in birth clinics directly after birth showed no significant differences in the mean scores of the PHQ-4 within the compared groups (mFMW= 2.83; mimmi=2.61; mnonimmi= 2.5; p=.72). CONCLUSIONS: While the quantitative study part indicates that PHQ-4 scores are independent of FM experience, the qualitative part shows that FM new mothers face particular burdens in their living conditions that make them vulnerable to MH issues. Inconsistent results could be attributed to the different timing in which the structured questionnaires and qualitative interviews were conducted. KEY MESSAGES: • To promote Mental health of new mothers, we advocate for a diversity oriented, responsive healthcare system. • Effective approaches must be provided to include FM mothers in existing Early Childhood Intervention programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9831331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98313312023-01-11 Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study Al Munjid, R Teschemacher, L Mohr, E Engelhardt, M Breckenkamp, J Borde, T Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: After forced migration, pregnant women and new mothers face specific challenges in the host country. Little research focuses on the impact these challenges have on forced migrant (FM) women’s mental health (MH). The study’s aim shed light on FM women’s mental wellbeing in the perinatal period. METHODS: For this mixed-method study 15 individual problem-centered interviews were carried out in Arabic with FM mothers living in Germany within the postnatal period to one year postpartum. The transcripts were analysed using the Framework Analysis. In addition, structured quantitative interviews with 3070 new mothers were conducted on 3 obstetric wards in Berlin over a period of 23 months using an adapted version of the MFMCQ and the PHQ4. FM women (n = 187) were compared with immigrant (n = 1192) and non-immigrant women (n = 1673). A Kruskal-Wallis-Test was performed to compare the three groups. RESULTS: In the qualitative interviews mothers stated having depression and varied emotions (e.g. unavoidable sadness, relief). Most FM mothers indicated contextual factors (e.g. bad housing conditions) and structural barriers in perinatal healthcare as negatively impacting their MH. The preliminary quantitative analysis of the interviews conducted in birth clinics directly after birth showed no significant differences in the mean scores of the PHQ-4 within the compared groups (mFMW= 2.83; mimmi=2.61; mnonimmi= 2.5; p=.72). CONCLUSIONS: While the quantitative study part indicates that PHQ-4 scores are independent of FM experience, the qualitative part shows that FM new mothers face particular burdens in their living conditions that make them vulnerable to MH issues. Inconsistent results could be attributed to the different timing in which the structured questionnaires and qualitative interviews were conducted. KEY MESSAGES: • To promote Mental health of new mothers, we advocate for a diversity oriented, responsive healthcare system. • Effective approaches must be provided to include FM mothers in existing Early Childhood Intervention programs. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9831331/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.445 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Al Munjid, R
Teschemacher, L
Mohr, E
Engelhardt, M
Breckenkamp, J
Borde, T
Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study
title Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study
title_full Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study
title_fullStr Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study
title_full_unstemmed Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study
title_short Forced migrant women’s Mental Health in the perinatal period in Germany- A mixed-method study
title_sort forced migrant women’s mental health in the perinatal period in germany- a mixed-method study
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831331/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.445
work_keys_str_mv AT almunjidr forcedmigrantwomensmentalhealthintheperinatalperiodingermanyamixedmethodstudy
AT teschemacherl forcedmigrantwomensmentalhealthintheperinatalperiodingermanyamixedmethodstudy
AT mohre forcedmigrantwomensmentalhealthintheperinatalperiodingermanyamixedmethodstudy
AT engelhardtm forcedmigrantwomensmentalhealthintheperinatalperiodingermanyamixedmethodstudy
AT breckenkampj forcedmigrantwomensmentalhealthintheperinatalperiodingermanyamixedmethodstudy
AT bordet forcedmigrantwomensmentalhealthintheperinatalperiodingermanyamixedmethodstudy