Cargando…

Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruban, Andrii, Petrovski, Beáta Éva, Petrovski, Goran, Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636618
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S402222
_version_ 1784867869412032512
author Ruban, Andrii
Petrovski, Beáta Éva
Petrovski, Goran
Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr M
author_facet Ruban, Andrii
Petrovski, Beáta Éva
Petrovski, Goran
Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr M
author_sort Ruban, Andrii
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9831524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98315242023-01-11 Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter] Ruban, Andrii Petrovski, Beáta Éva Petrovski, Goran Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr M Clin Ophthalmol Response to Letter Dove 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9831524/ /pubmed/36636618 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S402222 Text en © 2023 Ruban et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Response to Letter
Ruban, Andrii
Petrovski, Beáta Éva
Petrovski, Goran
Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr M
Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]
title Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]
title_full Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]
title_fullStr Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]
title_full_unstemmed Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]
title_short Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter]
title_sort comments on: internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for full-thickness macular holes of different etiology – is it still relevant? [response to letter]
topic Response to Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636618
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S402222
work_keys_str_mv AT rubanandrii commentsoninternallimitingmembranepeelingandgastamponadeforfullthicknessmacularholesofdifferentetiologyisitstillrelevantresponsetoletter
AT petrovskibeataeva commentsoninternallimitingmembranepeelingandgastamponadeforfullthicknessmacularholesofdifferentetiologyisitstillrelevantresponsetoletter
AT petrovskigoran commentsoninternallimitingmembranepeelingandgastamponadeforfullthicknessmacularholesofdifferentetiologyisitstillrelevantresponsetoletter
AT lytvynchuklyubomyrm commentsoninternallimitingmembranepeelingandgastamponadeforfullthicknessmacularholesofdifferentetiologyisitstillrelevantresponsetoletter