Comparative Clinical Study Between Chlorhexidine Gel (0.2%) and Hyaluronic Gel (1%) in the Prevention of a Dry Socket After Tooth Extraction for Orthodontic Treatment

Introduction Several articles have investigated the intra-alveolar applications of bioadhesive gels containing various medicines and active chemicals, such as chlorhexidine (CHX) and hyaluronic acid (HA) to minimize the numerous postoperative sequelae, such as a dry socket. The purpose of this study was to investigate the postoperative outcomes of intra-alveolar application of 0.2% chlorhexidine or hyaluronic acid following atraumatic extraction. Methods A randomized clinical trial was conducted on a sample of 36 patients who need extraction of lower first premolar for orthodontic treatment. The patients were assigned randomly into two groups: CHX group and HA group. The signs and symptoms of the dry socket were evaluated on the third day in two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the study and control groups when comparing the CHX group (P=0.2.6). In contrast, a significant difference was seen between the study and control sides in the HA group. Conclusions Within the limitation of this clinical trial, using hyaluronic gel with a gelatin sponge may be a preventive strategy for a dry socket following tooth extraction. After non-surgical tooth extraction, the topical administration of CHX with a gelatin sponge as a carrier did not seem to act as a protective substance against a dry socket.