Cargando…
Motivating factors of compliance to government's COVID-19 preventive guidelines: An investigation using discrete choice model
BACKGROUND: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in a worldwide pandemic. We aimed to identify the factors that motivate public compliance with the government's COVID-19 preventive recommendations. METHODS: Focus group interviews were conducted to identify influencing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.12.013 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in a worldwide pandemic. We aimed to identify the factors that motivate public compliance with the government's COVID-19 preventive recommendations. METHODS: Focus group interviews were conducted to identify influencing factors. The relative importance of each factor was investigated through a survey, based on a discrete choice model, from February to June, 2021 in South Korea. RESULTS: “Severity of COVID-19 symptoms” (relative importance [magnitude of attribute coefficients]: 28.40%) and “risk of infection” (27.50%) were the most influential health-related factors, followed by social consequences of infection, including “cessation of social activities due to self-quarantine” (19.77%), “risk of personal information being disclosed when infected and social criticism on the infected person” (15.78%), and “risk of spreading infection” (8.55%). Respondents behaved differently based on their socioeconomic characteristics and COVID-19 experience. DISCUSSION: The perceived severity of symptoms was a strong motivator among fragile individuals, such as women and older adults. “Cessation of social activities” was the most influential factor for those infected with COVID-19, while “risk of infection” was for those whose acquaintances were infected. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of information regarding COVID-19 to the public must be tailored based on an understanding of behavioral differences. |
---|