Cargando…

Condylar and ramus volume in asymmetric and symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion: A cone-beam computed tomography study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Among the craniofacial structures, the mandible is the only bony structure with movable joints. Each part (including condyle process, coronoid process, and ramus) of mandible would interaction with the muscles and proceed different osteogenesis progress. The objective of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Szu-Ting, Tsai, Pei-Lun, Chen, Shih-Chieh, Lin, Shih-Hsuan, Chen, Chun-Ming, Tseng, Yu-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.06.016
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Among the craniofacial structures, the mandible is the only bony structure with movable joints. Each part (including condyle process, coronoid process, and ramus) of mandible would interaction with the muscles and proceed different osteogenesis progress. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mandibles with symmetric and asymmetric skeletal Class III jaw relations by quantifying differences in the condyle process, coronoid process and ramus on CBCT (Cone-beam computer tomography) images. Our hypothesis was that CBCT would reveal no voluminal differences between deviated and non-deviated mandibular segments in asymmetric skeletal Class III. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT imagines were collected from dental department, KMUH and then divided into symmetric Class III group (Menton deviation < 4mm) and asymmetric Class III group (Menton deviation≧4mm). The mandibular structure would be segmented to ramus, condylar and coronoid process. Each volume was measured. Independent t test was used for comparison between groups, and paired t test was applied for comparison between both segmented parts within each group. RESULTS: Significant differences between deviation and non-deviation sides in the asymmetric group were found in condylar and ramus segments for volumetric quantitative measurements. There has no significant difference in ramus parts between groups. Significant greater condylar volume was found in non-deviation side of asymmetric group. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that in the side with greater mandible growth potential, the condylar and the ramus volume would be greater as well. CBCT is a useful and accurate modality for quantification and evaluation of mandibular asymmetry.