Cargando…
Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study
BACKGROUND: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), only radical surgery improves long‐term survival. We focused on surgical outcome after induction gemcitabine along with nab‐paclitaxel (GnP) and subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S‐1 administration for unresectable locally advanced (UR‐LA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12613 |
_version_ | 1784867948946522112 |
---|---|
author | Igarashi, Takamichi Yamada, Suguru Hoshino, Yui Murotani, Kenta Baba, Hayato Takami, Hideki Yoshioka, Isaku Shibuya, Kazuto Kodera, Yasuhiro Fujii, Tsutomu |
author_facet | Igarashi, Takamichi Yamada, Suguru Hoshino, Yui Murotani, Kenta Baba, Hayato Takami, Hideki Yoshioka, Isaku Shibuya, Kazuto Kodera, Yasuhiro Fujii, Tsutomu |
author_sort | Igarashi, Takamichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), only radical surgery improves long‐term survival. We focused on surgical outcome after induction gemcitabine along with nab‐paclitaxel (GnP) and subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S‐1 administration for unresectable locally advanced (UR‐LA) PDAC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 144 patients with UR‐LA PDAC between 2014 and 2020. The first‐line regimen of induction chemotherapy was GnP for 125 of the 144 patients. Of the 125 patients who received GnP, 41 who underwent radical resection after additional preoperative CRT were enrolled. We evaluated the prognostic factors for this treatment strategy. RESULTS: The median length of preoperative GnP was 8.8 months, and 30 (73%) patients had normalized CA19‐9 levels. R0 resection was achieved in 36 (88%) patients. Postoperative major complications of ≥Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa developed in 16 (39%) patients. With a median follow‐up of 35.2 months, 14 (34%) patients developed distant metastasis postoperatively. Using the Kaplan–Meier method, prognostic analysis of the 41 cases revealed the 3‐y overall survival rate (OS) was 77.4% and the 5‐y OS was 58.6%. In univariate analysis, length of preoperative GnP (≥8 months), CA19‐9 normalization, and good nutritional status at operation (prognostic nutritional index ≥41.7) were significantly associated with favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed CA19‐9 normalization (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23; P = .032) and prognostic nutritional index ≥41.7 (HR 0.05; P = .021) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: For surgical outcome after induction GnP and subsequent CRT for UR‐LA PDAC, CA19‐9 normalization and maintenance of good nutritional status during treatment until surgery were important for prolonged prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9831906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98319062023-01-12 Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study Igarashi, Takamichi Yamada, Suguru Hoshino, Yui Murotani, Kenta Baba, Hayato Takami, Hideki Yoshioka, Isaku Shibuya, Kazuto Kodera, Yasuhiro Fujii, Tsutomu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), only radical surgery improves long‐term survival. We focused on surgical outcome after induction gemcitabine along with nab‐paclitaxel (GnP) and subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S‐1 administration for unresectable locally advanced (UR‐LA) PDAC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 144 patients with UR‐LA PDAC between 2014 and 2020. The first‐line regimen of induction chemotherapy was GnP for 125 of the 144 patients. Of the 125 patients who received GnP, 41 who underwent radical resection after additional preoperative CRT were enrolled. We evaluated the prognostic factors for this treatment strategy. RESULTS: The median length of preoperative GnP was 8.8 months, and 30 (73%) patients had normalized CA19‐9 levels. R0 resection was achieved in 36 (88%) patients. Postoperative major complications of ≥Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa developed in 16 (39%) patients. With a median follow‐up of 35.2 months, 14 (34%) patients developed distant metastasis postoperatively. Using the Kaplan–Meier method, prognostic analysis of the 41 cases revealed the 3‐y overall survival rate (OS) was 77.4% and the 5‐y OS was 58.6%. In univariate analysis, length of preoperative GnP (≥8 months), CA19‐9 normalization, and good nutritional status at operation (prognostic nutritional index ≥41.7) were significantly associated with favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed CA19‐9 normalization (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23; P = .032) and prognostic nutritional index ≥41.7 (HR 0.05; P = .021) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: For surgical outcome after induction GnP and subsequent CRT for UR‐LA PDAC, CA19‐9 normalization and maintenance of good nutritional status during treatment until surgery were important for prolonged prognosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9831906/ /pubmed/36643365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12613 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Igarashi, Takamichi Yamada, Suguru Hoshino, Yui Murotani, Kenta Baba, Hayato Takami, Hideki Yoshioka, Isaku Shibuya, Kazuto Kodera, Yasuhiro Fujii, Tsutomu Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study |
title | Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study |
title_full | Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study |
title_fullStr | Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study |
title_short | Prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of a dual‐center study |
title_sort | prognostic factors in conversion surgery following nab‐paclitaxel with gemcitabine and subsequent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: results of a dual‐center study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT igarashitakamichi prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT yamadasuguru prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT hoshinoyui prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT murotanikenta prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT babahayato prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT takamihideki prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT yoshiokaisaku prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT shibuyakazuto prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT koderayasuhiro prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy AT fujiitsutomu prognosticfactorsinconversionsurgeryfollowingnabpaclitaxelwithgemcitabineandsubsequentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerresultsofadualcenterstudy |