Cargando…
A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries
Background and objective The development of modern anesthetic agents has made it possible to conduct pain-free surgical procedures. The role of the anesthetist in choosing a suitable anesthetic agent to provide a good anesthetic and sedative effect is very important in any surgical procedure. There...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644056 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32421 |
_version_ | 1784868031555436544 |
---|---|
author | Giri, Sanjeeb K Mohapatra, Partha S Senapati, Laxman K Mishra, Krishna |
author_facet | Giri, Sanjeeb K Mohapatra, Partha S Senapati, Laxman K Mishra, Krishna |
author_sort | Giri, Sanjeeb K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objective The development of modern anesthetic agents has made it possible to conduct pain-free surgical procedures. The role of the anesthetist in choosing a suitable anesthetic agent to provide a good anesthetic and sedative effect is very important in any surgical procedure. There is always a degree of risk involved as the hemodynamic parameters may be altered. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic changes and respiratory effects between the use of etomidate and propofol for the induction of general anesthesia (GA) as well as to compare the side effects of both drugs in daycare surgeries. Methods The study was a parallel-design, randomized, double-blinded control trial conducted over a period of three years among patients undergoing elective daycare surgeries under GA. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the type of drug received: Group A or the propofol group and Group B or the etomidate group. Randomization was done by computer-generated random number generator software. A total of 174 patients were selected (87 in each group) at a ratio of 1:1. A baseline evaluation of the hemodynamic parameters was done followed by continuous monitoring. Results The age, weight, and gender distribution of the patients in both groups were comparable. Significant hemodynamic changes were observed following induction in Group A. The fall in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in Group A following induction was found to be statistically significant (p<0.00). The rise in heart rate was almost similar in both groups, with Group A demonstrating a slightly higher rate. There were fewer signs of respiratory depression in Group B. The major side effects observed after induction were myoclonus, which was more prevalent in Group B patients (21.84%), and pain at the injection site, which was observed more frequently in Group A (17.1%). Conclusion Based on our findings, etomidate is a drug with better hemodynamic stability and less pain at the site of injection compared to propofol. Hence, it may be a better induction agent in daycare surgeries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9832317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98323172023-01-12 A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries Giri, Sanjeeb K Mohapatra, Partha S Senapati, Laxman K Mishra, Krishna Cureus Anesthesiology Background and objective The development of modern anesthetic agents has made it possible to conduct pain-free surgical procedures. The role of the anesthetist in choosing a suitable anesthetic agent to provide a good anesthetic and sedative effect is very important in any surgical procedure. There is always a degree of risk involved as the hemodynamic parameters may be altered. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic changes and respiratory effects between the use of etomidate and propofol for the induction of general anesthesia (GA) as well as to compare the side effects of both drugs in daycare surgeries. Methods The study was a parallel-design, randomized, double-blinded control trial conducted over a period of three years among patients undergoing elective daycare surgeries under GA. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the type of drug received: Group A or the propofol group and Group B or the etomidate group. Randomization was done by computer-generated random number generator software. A total of 174 patients were selected (87 in each group) at a ratio of 1:1. A baseline evaluation of the hemodynamic parameters was done followed by continuous monitoring. Results The age, weight, and gender distribution of the patients in both groups were comparable. Significant hemodynamic changes were observed following induction in Group A. The fall in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in Group A following induction was found to be statistically significant (p<0.00). The rise in heart rate was almost similar in both groups, with Group A demonstrating a slightly higher rate. There were fewer signs of respiratory depression in Group B. The major side effects observed after induction were myoclonus, which was more prevalent in Group B patients (21.84%), and pain at the injection site, which was observed more frequently in Group A (17.1%). Conclusion Based on our findings, etomidate is a drug with better hemodynamic stability and less pain at the site of injection compared to propofol. Hence, it may be a better induction agent in daycare surgeries. Cureus 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9832317/ /pubmed/36644056 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32421 Text en Copyright © 2022, Giri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Anesthesiology Giri, Sanjeeb K Mohapatra, Partha S Senapati, Laxman K Mishra, Krishna A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries |
title | A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries |
title_full | A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries |
title_short | A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes Between the Use of Etomidate and Propofol as Induction Agents for Anesthesia in Daycare Surgeries |
title_sort | comparison of hemodynamic changes between the use of etomidate and propofol as induction agents for anesthesia in daycare surgeries |
topic | Anesthesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644056 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT girisanjeebk acomparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT mohapatraparthas acomparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT senapatilaxmank acomparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT mishrakrishna acomparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT girisanjeebk comparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT mohapatraparthas comparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT senapatilaxmank comparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries AT mishrakrishna comparisonofhemodynamicchangesbetweentheuseofetomidateandpropofolasinductionagentsforanesthesiaindaycaresurgeries |