Cargando…

Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs

[Image: see text] Water molecules at protein–ligand interfaces are often of significant pharmaceutical interest, owing in part to the entropy which can be released upon the displacement of an ordered water by a therapeutic compound. Protein structures may not, however, completely resolve all critica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samways, Marley L., Bruce Macdonald, Hannah E., Taylor, Richard D., Essex, Jonathan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36469670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01225
_version_ 1784868066200387584
author Samways, Marley L.
Bruce Macdonald, Hannah E.
Taylor, Richard D.
Essex, Jonathan W.
author_facet Samways, Marley L.
Bruce Macdonald, Hannah E.
Taylor, Richard D.
Essex, Jonathan W.
author_sort Samways, Marley L.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Water molecules at protein–ligand interfaces are often of significant pharmaceutical interest, owing in part to the entropy which can be released upon the displacement of an ordered water by a therapeutic compound. Protein structures may not, however, completely resolve all critical bound water molecules, or there may be no experimental data available. As such, predicting the location of water molecules in the absence of a crystal structure is important in the context of rational drug design. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) is a computational technique that is gaining popularity for the simulation of buried water sites. In this work, we assess the ability of GCMC to accurately predict water binding locations, using a dataset that we have curated, containing 108 unique structures of complexes between proteins and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved small-molecule drugs. We show that GCMC correctly predicts 81.4% of nonbulk crystallographic water sites to within 1.4 Å. However, our analysis demonstrates that the reported performance of water prediction methods is highly sensitive to the way in which the performance is measured. We also find that crystallographic water sites with more protein/ligand hydrogen bonds and stronger electron density are more reliably predicted by GCMC. An analysis of water networks revealed that more than half of the structures contain at least one ligand-contacting water network. In these cases, displacement of a water site by a ligand modification might yield unexpected results if the larger network is destabilized. Cooperative effects between waters should therefore be explicitly considered in structure-based drug design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9832485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98324852023-01-12 Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs Samways, Marley L. Bruce Macdonald, Hannah E. Taylor, Richard D. Essex, Jonathan W. J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] Water molecules at protein–ligand interfaces are often of significant pharmaceutical interest, owing in part to the entropy which can be released upon the displacement of an ordered water by a therapeutic compound. Protein structures may not, however, completely resolve all critical bound water molecules, or there may be no experimental data available. As such, predicting the location of water molecules in the absence of a crystal structure is important in the context of rational drug design. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) is a computational technique that is gaining popularity for the simulation of buried water sites. In this work, we assess the ability of GCMC to accurately predict water binding locations, using a dataset that we have curated, containing 108 unique structures of complexes between proteins and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved small-molecule drugs. We show that GCMC correctly predicts 81.4% of nonbulk crystallographic water sites to within 1.4 Å. However, our analysis demonstrates that the reported performance of water prediction methods is highly sensitive to the way in which the performance is measured. We also find that crystallographic water sites with more protein/ligand hydrogen bonds and stronger electron density are more reliably predicted by GCMC. An analysis of water networks revealed that more than half of the structures contain at least one ligand-contacting water network. In these cases, displacement of a water site by a ligand modification might yield unexpected results if the larger network is destabilized. Cooperative effects between waters should therefore be explicitly considered in structure-based drug design. American Chemical Society 2022-12-05 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9832485/ /pubmed/36469670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01225 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Samways, Marley L.
Bruce Macdonald, Hannah E.
Taylor, Richard D.
Essex, Jonathan W.
Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs
title Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs
title_full Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs
title_fullStr Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs
title_full_unstemmed Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs
title_short Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs
title_sort water networks in complexes between proteins and fda-approved drugs
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36469670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01225
work_keys_str_mv AT samwaysmarleyl waternetworksincomplexesbetweenproteinsandfdaapproveddrugs
AT brucemacdonaldhannahe waternetworksincomplexesbetweenproteinsandfdaapproveddrugs
AT taylorrichardd waternetworksincomplexesbetweenproteinsandfdaapproveddrugs
AT essexjonathanw waternetworksincomplexesbetweenproteinsandfdaapproveddrugs