Cargando…

Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The use of sutures as ligatures has proven to be safe and reliable for the control of lymphatic vessels. The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) is a relatively new type of device that can be used to seal lymphatics. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EBV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehra, Ketan, Kapashi, Kushal, Khemchandani, Sajni, Modi, Pranjal Ramanlal, Rizvi, Syed Jamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Transplantation 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704804
http://dx.doi.org/10.4285/kjt.22.0045
_version_ 1784868084698316800
author Mehra, Ketan
Kapashi, Kushal
Khemchandani, Sajni
Modi, Pranjal Ramanlal
Rizvi, Syed Jamal
author_facet Mehra, Ketan
Kapashi, Kushal
Khemchandani, Sajni
Modi, Pranjal Ramanlal
Rizvi, Syed Jamal
author_sort Mehra, Ketan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of sutures as ligatures has proven to be safe and reliable for the control of lymphatic vessels. The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) is a relatively new type of device that can be used to seal lymphatics. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EBVS for preparation of the recipient vessel during renal transplantation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, EBVS (Medtronic) was compared with conventional ligature for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients. A total of 52 kidney transplant recipients were randomly assigned to two groups. In group 1, EBVS was used to control perivascular lymphatics, while conventional silk ligatures were used in group 2. Demographic characteristics, as well as preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables, were noted and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean recipient vessel preparation time was 8.3±1.9 minutes in group 1 and 14.5±4 minutes in group 2 (P<0.001). The mean anastomosis time was 28.2±5.4 minutes in group 1 and 28.2±4.2 minutes in group 2 (P=1.000). The mean estimated blood loss was 101.54±44.60 mL in group 1 and 125.19±74.17 mL in group 2 (P=0.270), and the mean drain output was 51.42 mL per day and 57.50 mL per day in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.590). CONCLUSIONS: EBVS can be employed safely and effectively for recipient iliac lymphatic vessel dissection and sealing. EBVS is a fast, secure, and effective choice to permanently fuse the vessels and is a good option to avoid posttransplant lymphatic complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9832589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Society for Transplantation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98325892023-01-25 Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients Mehra, Ketan Kapashi, Kushal Khemchandani, Sajni Modi, Pranjal Ramanlal Rizvi, Syed Jamal Korean J Transplant Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of sutures as ligatures has proven to be safe and reliable for the control of lymphatic vessels. The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) is a relatively new type of device that can be used to seal lymphatics. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EBVS for preparation of the recipient vessel during renal transplantation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, EBVS (Medtronic) was compared with conventional ligature for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients. A total of 52 kidney transplant recipients were randomly assigned to two groups. In group 1, EBVS was used to control perivascular lymphatics, while conventional silk ligatures were used in group 2. Demographic characteristics, as well as preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables, were noted and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean recipient vessel preparation time was 8.3±1.9 minutes in group 1 and 14.5±4 minutes in group 2 (P<0.001). The mean anastomosis time was 28.2±5.4 minutes in group 1 and 28.2±4.2 minutes in group 2 (P=1.000). The mean estimated blood loss was 101.54±44.60 mL in group 1 and 125.19±74.17 mL in group 2 (P=0.270), and the mean drain output was 51.42 mL per day and 57.50 mL per day in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.590). CONCLUSIONS: EBVS can be employed safely and effectively for recipient iliac lymphatic vessel dissection and sealing. EBVS is a fast, secure, and effective choice to permanently fuse the vessels and is a good option to avoid posttransplant lymphatic complications. The Korean Society for Transplantation 2022-12-31 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9832589/ /pubmed/36704804 http://dx.doi.org/10.4285/kjt.22.0045 Text en © 2022 The Korean Society for Transplantation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mehra, Ketan
Kapashi, Kushal
Khemchandani, Sajni
Modi, Pranjal Ramanlal
Rizvi, Syed Jamal
Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
title Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
title_full Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
title_fullStr Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
title_short Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
title_sort prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704804
http://dx.doi.org/10.4285/kjt.22.0045
work_keys_str_mv AT mehraketan prospectivecomparisonofsutureligationandelectrothermalsealingforthecontrolofperivascularlymphaticsinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT kapashikushal prospectivecomparisonofsutureligationandelectrothermalsealingforthecontrolofperivascularlymphaticsinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT khemchandanisajni prospectivecomparisonofsutureligationandelectrothermalsealingforthecontrolofperivascularlymphaticsinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT modipranjalramanlal prospectivecomparisonofsutureligationandelectrothermalsealingforthecontrolofperivascularlymphaticsinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT rizvisyedjamal prospectivecomparisonofsutureligationandelectrothermalsealingforthecontrolofperivascularlymphaticsinkidneytransplantrecipients