Cargando…

Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study

BACKGROUND: This in vitro study investigated the osseointegration and implant integration of high performance oxide ceramics (HPOC) compared to titanium implants in rabbits. METHODS: Histomorphometry was conducted around the distal, proximal, medial, and lateral aspects of the HPOC to quantify the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliorini, Filippo, Schenker, Hanno, Betsch, Marcel, Maffulli, Nicola, Tingart, Markus, Hildebrand, Frank, Lecouturier, Sophie, Rath, Björn, Eschweiler, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03494-7
_version_ 1784868089117016064
author Migliorini, Filippo
Schenker, Hanno
Betsch, Marcel
Maffulli, Nicola
Tingart, Markus
Hildebrand, Frank
Lecouturier, Sophie
Rath, Björn
Eschweiler, Jörg
author_facet Migliorini, Filippo
Schenker, Hanno
Betsch, Marcel
Maffulli, Nicola
Tingart, Markus
Hildebrand, Frank
Lecouturier, Sophie
Rath, Björn
Eschweiler, Jörg
author_sort Migliorini, Filippo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This in vitro study investigated the osseointegration and implant integration of high performance oxide ceramics (HPOC) compared to titanium implants in rabbits. METHODS: Histomorphometry was conducted around the distal, proximal, medial, and lateral aspects of the HPOC to quantify the amount of mature and immature ossification within the bone interface. Histomorphometry was conducted by a trained musculoskeletal pathologist. The region of interest (ROI) represented the percentage of surrounding area of the implant. The percentage of ROI covered by osteoid implant contact (OIC) and mature bone implant contact (BIC) were assessed. The surrounding presence of bone resorption, necrosis, and/or inflammation were quantitatively investigated. RESULTS: All 34 rabbits survived the 6- and 12-week experimental period. All HPOC implants remained in situ. The mean weight difference from baseline was + 647.7 mg (P < 0.0001). The overall OIC of the ceramic group was greater at 6 weeks compared to the titanium implants (P = 0.003). The other endpoints of interest were similar between the two implants at all follow-up points. No difference was found in BIC at 6- and 12-weeks follow-up. No bone necrosis, resorption, or inflammation were observed. CONCLUSION: HPOC implants demonstrated a greater osteoid implant contact at 6 weeks compared to the titanium implants, with no difference found at 12 weeks. The percentage of bone implant contact of HPOC implants was similar to that promoted by titanium implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9832611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98326112023-01-12 Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study Migliorini, Filippo Schenker, Hanno Betsch, Marcel Maffulli, Nicola Tingart, Markus Hildebrand, Frank Lecouturier, Sophie Rath, Björn Eschweiler, Jörg J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This in vitro study investigated the osseointegration and implant integration of high performance oxide ceramics (HPOC) compared to titanium implants in rabbits. METHODS: Histomorphometry was conducted around the distal, proximal, medial, and lateral aspects of the HPOC to quantify the amount of mature and immature ossification within the bone interface. Histomorphometry was conducted by a trained musculoskeletal pathologist. The region of interest (ROI) represented the percentage of surrounding area of the implant. The percentage of ROI covered by osteoid implant contact (OIC) and mature bone implant contact (BIC) were assessed. The surrounding presence of bone resorption, necrosis, and/or inflammation were quantitatively investigated. RESULTS: All 34 rabbits survived the 6- and 12-week experimental period. All HPOC implants remained in situ. The mean weight difference from baseline was + 647.7 mg (P < 0.0001). The overall OIC of the ceramic group was greater at 6 weeks compared to the titanium implants (P = 0.003). The other endpoints of interest were similar between the two implants at all follow-up points. No difference was found in BIC at 6- and 12-weeks follow-up. No bone necrosis, resorption, or inflammation were observed. CONCLUSION: HPOC implants demonstrated a greater osteoid implant contact at 6 weeks compared to the titanium implants, with no difference found at 12 weeks. The percentage of bone implant contact of HPOC implants was similar to that promoted by titanium implants. BioMed Central 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9832611/ /pubmed/36631843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03494-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Migliorini, Filippo
Schenker, Hanno
Betsch, Marcel
Maffulli, Nicola
Tingart, Markus
Hildebrand, Frank
Lecouturier, Sophie
Rath, Björn
Eschweiler, Jörg
Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
title Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
title_full Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
title_fullStr Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
title_short Silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
title_sort silica coated high performance oxide ceramics promote greater ossification than titanium implants: an in vivo study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03494-7
work_keys_str_mv AT migliorinifilippo silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT schenkerhanno silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT betschmarcel silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT maffullinicola silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT tingartmarkus silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT hildebrandfrank silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT lecouturiersophie silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT rathbjorn silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy
AT eschweilerjorg silicacoatedhighperformanceoxideceramicspromotegreaterossificationthantitaniumimplantsaninvivostudy