Cargando…
Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be?
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of routine outcome measures (ROM) in mental health services worldwide. Australia has been at the forefront of introducing ROM in public mental health services, with the aim of improving services and consumer outcomes. METHODS: An in-depth policy and d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04459-0 |
_version_ | 1784868132309958656 |
---|---|
author | Oster, Candice Dawson, Suzanne Kernot, Jocelyn Lawn, Sharon |
author_facet | Oster, Candice Dawson, Suzanne Kernot, Jocelyn Lawn, Sharon |
author_sort | Oster, Candice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of routine outcome measures (ROM) in mental health services worldwide. Australia has been at the forefront of introducing ROM in public mental health services, with the aim of improving services and consumer outcomes. METHODS: An in-depth policy and document analysis was conducted using Carol Bacchi’s ‘What is the problem represented to be?’ approach to critically analyse the use of ROM. This approach was used to identify and analyse the problem representations relating to the need for, and the choice of, outcome measures in Australian public mental health services, and the potential consequences of policy and practice. Data included in the analysis were seven policy documents, four reports on the introduction of outcome measures in Australia, the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classifications Network website, and the content of the outcome measures themselves. RESULTS: Two dominant representations of the ‘problem’ were identified: 1) the ‘problem’ of mental health service quality and accountability, relating to the need for mental health outcome measures; and 2) the ‘problem’ of addressing deficits in biopsychosocial functioning of mental health consumers, which relates to the choice of outcome measures. Framing the ‘problem’ of mental health outcomes in these ways locates the problem within individual health providers, services, and consumers, ignoring the broader socioeconomic conditions underpinning mental health and effective service provision. CONCLUSIONS: This critical analysis of the introduction and use of ROM in public mental health services in Australia highlights the need to consider the role of the social determinants of mental health, mental health service funding, and recovery-oriented care in ensuring services are meeting consumer needs and expectations. Broader governmental engagement is central to genuine change and opportunities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9832818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98328182023-01-12 Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? Oster, Candice Dawson, Suzanne Kernot, Jocelyn Lawn, Sharon BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of routine outcome measures (ROM) in mental health services worldwide. Australia has been at the forefront of introducing ROM in public mental health services, with the aim of improving services and consumer outcomes. METHODS: An in-depth policy and document analysis was conducted using Carol Bacchi’s ‘What is the problem represented to be?’ approach to critically analyse the use of ROM. This approach was used to identify and analyse the problem representations relating to the need for, and the choice of, outcome measures in Australian public mental health services, and the potential consequences of policy and practice. Data included in the analysis were seven policy documents, four reports on the introduction of outcome measures in Australia, the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classifications Network website, and the content of the outcome measures themselves. RESULTS: Two dominant representations of the ‘problem’ were identified: 1) the ‘problem’ of mental health service quality and accountability, relating to the need for mental health outcome measures; and 2) the ‘problem’ of addressing deficits in biopsychosocial functioning of mental health consumers, which relates to the choice of outcome measures. Framing the ‘problem’ of mental health outcomes in these ways locates the problem within individual health providers, services, and consumers, ignoring the broader socioeconomic conditions underpinning mental health and effective service provision. CONCLUSIONS: This critical analysis of the introduction and use of ROM in public mental health services in Australia highlights the need to consider the role of the social determinants of mental health, mental health service funding, and recovery-oriented care in ensuring services are meeting consumer needs and expectations. Broader governmental engagement is central to genuine change and opportunities. BioMed Central 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9832818/ /pubmed/36627588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04459-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Oster, Candice Dawson, Suzanne Kernot, Jocelyn Lawn, Sharon Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
title | Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
title_full | Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
title_fullStr | Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
title_full_unstemmed | Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
title_short | Mental health outcome measures in the Australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
title_sort | mental health outcome measures in the australian context: what is the problem represented to be? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04459-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ostercandice mentalhealthoutcomemeasuresintheaustraliancontextwhatistheproblemrepresentedtobe AT dawsonsuzanne mentalhealthoutcomemeasuresintheaustraliancontextwhatistheproblemrepresentedtobe AT kernotjocelyn mentalhealthoutcomemeasuresintheaustraliancontextwhatistheproblemrepresentedtobe AT lawnsharon mentalhealthoutcomemeasuresintheaustraliancontextwhatistheproblemrepresentedtobe |